Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The debate arisen by the author is multi-layered, inasmuch as societies' proper operation is contingent upon the fairness of its judicial system. Therefore, it is essential for laws not to be frozen but evolve along the development of societies, especially because they are telltale of their essence and mirror its values.
As highlighted by international institutions and conventions, there are laws common to all countries. Behaviours and decisions related to the well-being and integrity of citizens as individuals must indeed be ruled by laws irrespective of places or time. On the other hand, the amendment of laws, when necessary, has to abide by stringent supervision and cogent implementation. Otherwise, the later all too often slide into the realm of personal interests and serve the powerful, denoting rampant corruption.
It is crucial to seize that laws are only instruments used by professionals to ensure safety, protect minorities or demarcate commercial trades. Their uses might vary depending if the law had been deliberately or unintenionally infringed, on what grounds and for what reasons. Laws shouldn't thus all be subject to permanent reassessment, for it lies in their custodians' responsibility to adapt it to situations. While you cannot impose the same punishment to someone who killed for mercenary gains and one who did so to save his own life, some laws have to be inflexible. This forces people to follow rules because they are afraid of, and urges the cognisance of the fact that if they act wrongly, they will be punished upon them. If equality in terms of law isn't always paired with equity, in most cases, the flexibility has thus to be shown by judges, lawyers, and citizens when jurors.
One can't either fail to consider that many laws have been changed or promulgated by considerating the surrounding; the pervasive consequences of which have permited enhancing the well-being of many citizens. The authorisation for women to vote is a quintessential example since back hundred years ago, such a fundamental right were a man’s prerequisite in the United States.
On the other hand, child marriages were a common practice in early Indian society. At that time, the girls and boys were being forced to marry at a very young age. This resulted in very serious implications, as early motherhood for girls, or no possibility to further education. The nation was then undergoing a defining change when its citizens realised that this practice was an actual subjugation of children's rights. A need for imposing a ban over it ensued, and these marriages are now illegal. Had the judiciary system not been flexible enough to incorporate such changes, this could never have been possible.
The law is the people's need, made by and for him. Its proclivity to changes, carefully assayed, is thus a prerequisite for societies to properly burgeon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...what grounds and for what reasons. Laws shouldnt thus all be subject to permanent reasse...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... upon them. If equality in terms of law isnt always paired with equity, in most case...
^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...wyers, and citizens when jurors. One cant either fail to consider that many laws ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19527896996 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03915167865 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596566523605 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3260316923 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.045454545 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192030317661 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503366304054 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571639052587 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881018238586 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506552975133 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.