Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Before the debate can be substantiated, it is essential to comprehend the conundrum concatenated to the issue raised by the author. Knowledge is indeed complex per se, for it is a limitless reservoir but a limited resource to an individual or a whole generation. The more we know, though, the more we can understand our world ; but it is also true that the more we know, the more we realise to be philistines about it. Therefore, an either-or answer to this dichotomy would lack significance, and after weighing the pros and cons as detailed below, it would be clear that the more we know, the more mankind grows up and burgeons.
To begin with, despite fundamental technological, theoretical and practical advances in a plethora of fields, almost all the components of universe such as dark mater and dark energy remain to be unbeknownst to us. In recent research, neuroscientists have also asserted that we only use a little part of our brain. These instances are telltale of two defining constituents feeding the debate: science holds the key to understand our world, which at the same time, is and will always be an everlasting source of intricacy.
Contemporary world is relentlessly changing, and the manner in which maths, biology or chemistry evolve and throw the light on many recondite and obscure topics, sets the tempo of our lives. As we acquire more knowledge, certain habits and practices change, and scientists as well as the laity are in a state of flux, regenerated as soon as academicians have contributed wonders to our world. The main explanation to this phenomenon is that the scientific process evolves along a continuum and there is no end at it. The discoveries made in certain fields have even caused to repudiate previous beliefs and theories, to the extent of reshaping entire areas of study. The works on genetics, on the world's shape or on the human's genes are testament to this fact. Thus, to imbibe its core, one should have a thirst of learning but also accept, as Heraclitus said, that the world is subject to change, its only constant.
The world's complexity, from the human body to the interstellar system, can then either be regarded as a problem, an unresolvable quandary, or as a silver lining. Indeed, it provides people with infinite and passionate information to seize the genesis of our close and remote surrounding; but also permits us to fuel our cognitive skills, and the knowledge acquired is what distinguishes human beings from any other form of life, putting us at the rank of the most advanced species.
The last argument flow from the previous ones, and it is instrumental in this debate to put things into perspective by looking at our society, say, a hundred years ago. The celerity with which medicine, for instance, has grown to be more comprehensible, and all the positive impacts ensuing the progress and discoveries made in this field far outweigh the data and concepts we don't have fathom so far. Additionally, the fact that science reveals to us that the world is persistently more complex doesn't mean that it wasn't so before our epiphany, and shouldn't either preclude us from rejoicing in and benefiting from the most brilliant minds' discoveries.
To conclude, the quest for perfect enlightenment is more a form of myth than something palpable; and even though the learning process paves the way for additional quandaries, one can't ignore the positive sprawling impacts that the comprehension of our world has on our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ent of reshaping entire areas of study. The works on genetics, on the worlds shape ...
^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...genetics, on the worlds shape or on the humans genes are testament to this fact. Thus,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ct to change, its only constant. The worlds complexity, from the human body to the ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d far outweigh the data and concepts we dont have fathom so far. Additionally, the f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fathomed'.
Suggestion: fathomed
...eigh the data and concepts we dont have fathom so far. Additionally, the fact that sci...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 497, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the world is persistently more complex doesnt mean that it wasnt so before our epipha...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 517, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...tently more complex doesnt mean that it wasnt so before our epiphany, and shouldnt ei...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...at it wasnt so before our epiphany, and shouldnt either preclude us from rejoicing in an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the way for additional quandaries, one cant ignore the positive sprawling impacts t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2915.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 587.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96592844974 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91301212906 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54003407155 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3285184664 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.421052632 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8947368421 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244488674286 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659014451388 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535850076953 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118513500941 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315806547136 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.