A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is the cornerstone of every nation and children are its future academicians, workers and rulers. A strong common basis in all fields is thus essential for them to burgeon as well-educated citizens, and so that the chosen path of study or career can be a reflected decision, made by a witting mind. I wouldn't be as unqualified as is the author though, for differences between the students arise before college and this statement presents several limits.
If society was a pyramid, the uniform national curriculum would be the base. Fundamental courses in sciences, literature or history are prerequisites for pupils to be able to move on next academical steps, and are yardsticks of each one's predispositions and hurdles. The learning process evolves along a continuum, and all the instructed topics cohere to define the deal of knowledge required to culminate in any subsequent field of study. It is also clear that most secondary school students, if the choice were up to them, would pursue the most convenient path, or the one considered the less arduous. Thus, national educative benchmarks permit to standardise the required skills.
Such a uniformity might also act as a bulwark against all forms of disparities. Students from rural or underprivileged areas would be provided with the same means to succeed as their counterparts in bigger cities or wealthy surroundings. Only one entrance test would be valid to further studies in university, eliciting the need of being excellent in all the areas of study. Be they poor or rich, students would be slipped out of their comfort zone, and the best of them would highlight an insatiable thirst of learning, independent of the talent.
Stringent homogeneity, though, is detrimental to both students and professors, and would be a myopic view. Beyond a certain age, the ramifications of studying the same national curriculum are antithetical to the ones expected, and would only stymie the potential peculiar to each individual. Even if their career path isn't clearly drawn, sixteen-year-old students are fully able to identify the areas they enjoy studying, and in which they are most likely to succeed. Therefore, a nation rendering mandatory the courses of physics, for instance, even for those significantly attracted by the arts and literature, would only result in an increased loss of interest and many dropping out of school.
The role of pedagogues is also to accompany students to their apotheosis and emphasise their talents. North-East European institutions are testament to the fact that the key of education's proper functioning is the capacity to adapt to every one's idiosyncrasies, and not moulding its citizens into robots. Both instructors and students would indeed engage in a symbiotic and collaborative relationship if all of those attending the class were keenly interested in it. The contents could be broadened and extended for all to be best equipped once at university, leading to the standards of excellence's raising in the country, which would benefit in turn the whole society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 83
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 77
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 79
- Some people claim that a nations s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain 83
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ted decision, made by a witting mind. I wouldnt be as unqualified as is the author thou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standardising'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: standardising
...s, national educative benchmarks permit to standardise the required skills. Such a uniformi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...h individual. Even if their career path isnt clearly drawn, sixteen-year-old student...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2585.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24340770791 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06324836927 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559837728195 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1684624489 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.65 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226800666117 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693059369141 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489480200244 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125748042588 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03061047761 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.