Leadership
The world is often divided between leaders and followers; the tradition has been prevalent since the inchoate stages of democracy in ancient Greece. Leaders are ubiquitous irrepsective of the field. They define roles, goals and visions. Therefore, understanding the importance of leader is significant. This importance can be gauged from the amount of studies conducted by the psychologists on understanding the construct in detail. Leaders are hence, an internal part of any organization. A leader who understands the nuances and shades of an organization are undoubtedly an asset, because of their understandings of the workings and mechanisms of an institution. Therefore, one who has better understanding of the organization is more adept at leading it. And the best candidate for such role according to the prompt is internal candidates deemed to be qualified. I partially disagree with this reason for 2 reasons.
To begin, understanding of a thing does not equate to critical thinking and analytical skills. The reason given for the claim, fails to consider the point that analytical and critical thinking skills are much more important for success of an organization. For instance, a child may understand a concept taught in class and therefore, might be able to produce the text in examination. However, it is imperative to remember that if an application based question is asked in exam; there is a possibility that child might not be able to apply the concept learned. Similarly, being cognizant of organizations does not guarantee effectives.
Moreover, there are several qualities of a leader that have to be examined before deciding on an individual. A novice candidate might also be a great option considering he understands how the different parameters and aspects of market, company and policies play out. Therefore, a quality of being prescient is non-negotiable in selecting a right choice.
Further, a candidate from outside the organization will bring in his own experiences and competencies. For example, due to working in same environment for the same time; the company candidate might not be able to think of a problematic circumstance in new light. Whereas, an external candidate due to his personal and professional experiences will broaden the horizon of thinking and therefore, be more effective.
Although some might argue that looking for a candidate outside the institution will lead to profligacy of resources such as time and money. But in doing so, they forget that selecting a candidate from inside the organization will also require resources and if there are no options upto the mark, it will lead to wasting of resources twice. Moreover, learning the complexities of an organization does not require as much time as one assumes. For example, recently the recent President hire of Medley Pharma is an external candidate and has increased the sales by 10% in the few months time.
Therefore, an organization should take the decision of hiring an effective leaders according to skills, determination and foresight thinking for success rather than basing the decision just on familiarity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 76, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'leader'?
Suggestion: leader
...ake the decision of hiring an effective leaders according to skills, determination and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33939393939 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17431277696 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 846.9 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5212301221 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.653846154 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0384615385 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65384615385 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.