Leadership must change after five years.
Leadership, by definition, is a dynamic concept: it varies its form, and meaning depending upon several factors, like, time, place et cetera. While some people might argue that leadership is an static concept, for they always consider that the word LEADERSHIP is valid only in political play, and they further argue, since the ancient time the very word defines the same, that is, ability to work for peoples’ welfare. Hence, they finally conclude that it is not really necessary to refine the leadership after certain period of time because whoever is capable of fulfilling their certain demands today, can do it in the changed scenario of tomorrow also. However, my view, which acutely contradicts with some critics’ view stated above, is that society – and the global community too, which changes its form rapidly, and to understand the transformed society, leadership must be refined after certain period, lets say, after five years.
Those who would argue that if current leadership is fulfilling present public demands, it would not be compelling for them to provide space for leadership refinement may give example of Nepalese Politics. Late Girija Prasad Koirala, once popular PM among Nepalese people, did his best and gratified peoples’ demand; he became PM for five times. Later, his performance started to decline, but still his myrmidons claimed that he is the only one who deserve this position because he has contributed much for democracy in the past. Up to this point, the critic’s position may be right to some extent, however, due to his obduracy to stay in power, Nepal achieved nothing significant in his politically active era. The pith of the story was that he mainly did not allowed for leadership refinement, and always insisted that he is the only one who deserve to be the PM. In this power-play, he rarely gave attention to economic progress, but always stayed solicitous about his turn for premiership. Now what? Due to such leadership freezing culture, Nepal is among the most indigent countries in the world.
Now, consider the stories of two giant neighbors of Nepal: China and India. In China (People’s Republic of China), according to some political analysts, the changes brought by Mao Zedong was the demand of time. The contemporary policies put forwarded by Mao, as the chairperson of Chinese Communist Party, was highly intended to isolate China from international community. He closed all the doors of China, and did whatever he thought, it was right – including the inhumane cultural revolution. Later, Deng Xiaoping came to the helm, and convinced his fellow party members, and hoi poloi that the time has demanded some vital changes, including opening the Chinese economy for foreigners. Finally, he redefined Chinese economic sphere, going against many Mao’s ideology to some esteem. Later, Ziang Zamin came to the eminence of the Chinese politics, and carried some of the good legacies of his predecessors and further refined the system as per his brain. Due to these gradual changes, along with the change in leadership, now China stands as the second largest economy with net economic volume of some $ 17 trillions. In crux, it is the change brought about by the refinement in leadership along with the dynamic time.
Like China, India is another genuine example where its leadership is doing its best to bring change in the life of its peoples. When Dr. Manmohan Sing was finance minister, he contributed his country by introducing metro-rail in the Indian capital – Delhi. Additionally, he gave good momentum to his country’s economy. As his party was enthralled by his performance as the finance minister, finally, he climbed to the chair of Premiership. Now, Narendra Modi came to the power after wooing Indian people that he will establish India as a estimable country in the world. After, his advent, he helped India to achieve a robust economic growth of 7.5% this year – the fastest growth, which overtakes China, in the world for this year. He has brought solid plans to enhance connectivity in Indian states by introducing bullet trains, and for this Indian authorities has asked for help with countries like, China and Japan. Looking from outside, it seems, they are thriving in their plan till today.
To recapitulate, above referred premises are enough to consolidate my assertion that leadership needs to be refined, and redefined after a certain period of time; popularly after five years period. The examples presented – including that of Nepal, China, and India makes clear the role of new leadership toward the sophistication of the country. Today, Nepal is in the worse condition mainly due to freezing leadership, and its two giant neighbors are striding in the development due to leadership refinement and the original visions carried by them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng depending upon several factors, like, time, place et cetera. While some people...
^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e people might argue that leadership is an static concept, for they always conside...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...HIP is valid only in political play, and they further argue, since the ancient ti...
^^
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... to refine the leadership after certain period of time because whoever is capable of fulfillin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 658, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... it in the changed scenario of tomorrow also. However, my view, which acutely contra...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...current leadership is fulfilling present public demands, it would not be compelli...
^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'allow'
Suggestion: allow
...of the story was that he mainly did not allowed for leadership refinement, and always i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e most indigent countries in the world. Now, consider the stories of two giant n...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 872, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ce of the Chinese politics, and carried some of the good legacies of his predecessors and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1114, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$17'.
Suggestion: $17
...conomy with net economic volume of some $ 17 trillions. In crux, it is the change br...
^^^^
Line 7, column 542, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... people that he will establish India as a estimable country in the world. After, ...
^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... refined, and redefined after a certain period of time; popularly after five years period. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254329004329 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.140692640693 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0876623376623 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0400432900433 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0562770562771 0.0444667217837 127% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.122294372294 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.038961038961 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72370827457 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0313852813853 0.030933414821 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0790043290043 0.0997080785238 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00865800865801 0.0249443105267 35% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119047619048 0.0148568991511 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 4868.0 2732.02544248 178% => OK
No of words: 790.0 452.878318584 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16202531646 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30159774456 4.58838876751 116% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.39746835443 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30253164557 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20253164557 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124050632911 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72370827457 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 396.0 219.290929204 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501265822785 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 67.7394371062 55.4138127331 122% => OK
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6194690265 155% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6875 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1824900502 59.4972553346 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.125 141.124799967 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.40625 0.674092028746 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.21349557522 230% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 54.940664557 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.75342465753 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109391667298 0.391690518653 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110391607385 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0658984586265 0.077325440228 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48132937719 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148399067834 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383285607263 0.161403998019 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551862440272 0.0892212321368 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.419363736259 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0487665415145 0.0692045440612 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086574011954 0.275328986314 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546648209566 0.0653680567796 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.