Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples
that could be used to both support and challenge your position.
There is a saying "No Pain, No Gain " and this statement is an universal truth in every field. In real life the road to success is a bed of thrones, so one cannot reach it by mere luck. One has to give his full dedication, hard work and follow work ethics to reach his goal.
Firstly, if only luck would have been only criteria for success than people would not worked so hard to achieve what they wanted, it would have happened by mere luck. One should never bias his/her thoughts by seeing one person success which mighit happen by mere chance, but if we see overall no one can become a successful person by only luck and without any work ethics and hard work. There may be a case that a student can get lucky and by chance he scores 325 or lets say 330 in GRE exam, but that alone will never help him reaching his real goal, if he has not worked hard or have not followed work ethics than he would never be able to get a seat in a one of the best Grad School. So, it is preety obvious that someone might get lucky by chance in life but that will not help him in long run or to culminate his ultimate goal.
Secondly, if one does not follow work ethics and depend on luck alone, then he will be left dishearted in longer run. If luck would have been the primary reason for one's success than the world would not be such a place, no one would have ever worked hard to discover new things which made our life easier. Our leaders, global CEOs, great scientist, great writers/painters have been able to reach their esteem position only by working hard and following proper work ethics. There is also a saying that " Luck only favours the Brave", which meanse that luck will never favour a person who does not take the pain to do his part of hard work and try reaching his goal.
Now, some may argue that even after hard work luck is very crucial for sucess of an individual or a company. They may argue that in real world two company may be producing the same thing but one is more popular or successful by luck. But, its not the case we have to understand the underlying complexities of becoming successful. There are many small things involved such as marketing, innovation at the right time, targetting the correct customer for making a product successful. If we take the example of "Essential Phone" which was recently launched with great specs but it failed, one should never blame the same on mere luck. There were may important things which the company missed such as customer service or proper marketing which lead to the failure of the product and not luck.
In conclusion, although one may always argue that Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does, but as long as one never tries or give his cent percent by following proper work ethics, he will be never culminate his goal in a longer run. One may be a king of one day by mere luck, but not a great leader without work ethics and hard work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n, No Gain ' and this statement is an universal truth in every field. In real...
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...each his goal. Firstly, if only luck would have been only criteria for success than people w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...et lucky and by chance he scores 325 or lets say 330 in GRE exam, but that alone wil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reach' or 'reach'.
Suggestion: to reach; reach
...xam, but that alone will never help him reaching his real goal, if he has not worked har...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... left dishearted in longer run. If luck would have been the primary reason for ones success tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... would have been the primary reason for ones success than the world would not be suc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ore popular or successful by luck. But, its not the case we have to understand the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40181818182 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24361352574 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2872433867 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.421052632 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9473684211 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183091863934 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681454554696 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466797119878 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123764751487 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397017692185 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 48.8420337079 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.