Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The topic raises the controversial issue that Government should make sure their major cities receives financial support they need in order to thrive. Indisputably, I agree to some extent that, yes big cities should receive financial support in order to thrive but this should not come at an expense of lower financial support for smallar cities or towns. Nevertheless, government should not only look at the size of the city or opulation while making allocation of funds rather they should work on the plan to spend public money judiciously in order to uplift the country as a wholesome.
First of all if government only considers major cities while allocation of public money then it would led to growth of only couple f big cities in the country which would lead to crowded cities, over population, hapazard construction and this all will lead to other issues like traffic and pollution. To illustrate this let us look at the example of the silicon valley of India, Bangalore where due to the above reasons had become almost an unlivable city as due to allocation of hige funds and development in the cities, the city had become overcrowded, pulluted and traffic issues as most IT people have migrated here.Similar situation is also observed in other major cities of India like Mumbai. Thus government should never consider onlybigger cities while allocation of funds.
Secondly the money that government is going to spend or allocate is taxpayer's money from all cities and states of a country along with money generated from natural resources. So if government go ahead and allocate majority of the fund to big cities of particular states then it would lead to militant activity and generate antinational attitute among states or cities which receives lesser funds. To illustrate this further I would again take the example of a region in India, "North-East" India where due to low allocation of government funds leading to underdevelopment of these states, specially in 1990's and this led to the formation of one of the largest militant group of world known as ULFA, whose main motive was to create an separate country as government of India was not allocating sufficient funds to these states even though government was able to generate a huge amount of money from these states due to abundancy of mineral resources like oil, gas and uranium and also North East region contributed to more then 50% of tea grown all over world and majority of these was exported to other countries. Thus looking into these senerios I would like to reamphasize that government should consider all cities/states of country while providing financial support/funds.
Thirdly as major cities would already have sufficient funding for development for the city due to commercial taxes being generated from bigger companies and funds doneted under CSR activity by various MNC, so smaller cities are in more need of government funding for proper development and upliftment.
In conclusion, although to some extent bigger cities need larger funds for faster growth of these cities which will in a way lead to attract more MNC to these cities and foreign investment. As long as a government main emphasis is to uplift country as an wholesome and not few cities, governement should not only consider size of the city as only criteria to allocate funds but also look into other various factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 576, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ously in order to uplift the country as a wholesome. First of all if government only...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to uplift the country as a wholesome. First of all if government only consider...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...llocation of public money then it would led to growth of only couple f big cities i...
^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
... pulluted and traffic issues as most IT people have migrated here.Similar situation is...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similar
...es as most IT people have migrated here.Similar situation is also observed in other maj...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ther major cities of India like Mumbai. Thus government should never consider onlybi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 610, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...rdevelopment of these states, specially in 1990s and this led to the formation of one of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 742, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s ULFA, whose main motive was to create an separate country as government of India...
^^
Line 9, column 1033, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...o North East region contributed to more then 50% of tea grown all over world and maj...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile providing financial support/funds. Thirdly as major cities would already ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 253, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t main emphasis is to uplift country as an wholesome and not few cities, governeme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2840.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 559.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08050089445 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79924954524 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432915921288 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 894.6 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 154.892785978 60.3974514979 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 218.461538462 118.986275619 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 23.4991977007 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 5.21951772744 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244813960361 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128278425494 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078961946843 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165175881046 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649340451323 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 48.8420337079 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.1743820225 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.