Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to both support and challenge your position.
The prompt claims that to success depends more on luck than on work ethics. I strongly disagree and think even though luck might be helpfulfor a success story, to actually obtain a significant achievement, one needs a good work ethics, like the virtue of persistence and good planning skills. Luck can only help but could not carry the whole process of making something great.
Persistence, compared to luck, is more essential to the process of making something significant. One example that shows the importance of persistence is the story of how Edison invented the lightbulb. While trying to find a material that would make enough light while not burn out right away, Edison could be considered extremely unlucky. He tried thousands and thousands of materials, while his funding and recources drains. But Edison did not give up and kept on with the research. His persistence finally paied off when he discovered the material that would light the 20th century, tonston. Luck was not by Edison's side when he was searching for materials for the lightbulb. It was his peersisten and unwillingness to give up that made him the man that we know today who invented the lightbulb.
Sometimes someone could be very lucky, but if he does not have a good work ethics like good managment skills, the he will have a low chance to be able to utilize the luck and be successful. There are ample stories of lottery winners that dissipated their wealth on induglances and alchol and gambeing in a few years and end up in a worse place that they begined with. With a big lottery prize money, those winners had more than enough funds to starts a sustainable and comfortable life. They could even invest the money into opening up a bussiness. But to retrain the desire to spend their sudden wealth and be responsible with the prize money requires then to have good work ehthics like appropriate planning of the future. Therefore, even if luck is on a person's side, to be succssful, he needs to have good work ethics.
One might say that in some cases, one will not be successful if not for luck. One such example is the story of the discovery of penicilin. Penicilin was discovered because a lab personel accidentally pbserved that a patch of mold was discouraging the growth of a colony of bactaria. After culturing a pure strand of that mold, the lab technichian discovered what we now call penicilin. It was used extensively to treat wide range of infection. Specifically, penicilin was used to treat the wounded during D-Day in 1944 when the ally forces storm the beach of Normandy. People might claim that the ally might suffer more casuaties if not for that lucky lab personel. However, less known is that fact that penicilin could not be used in large scale opertion like D-Day if not for the tireless and careful research by British and American scientists. They made it viable to mass produce penicilin and thus made it viable to use on many wounded soldiers. Therefore, evne though penicilin is discovered by chance, one of its most successful application would not happen if not for the work ethics of researhcers.
In summation, even though luck is helpful in achieving success, it is not more important than good working habbits. People with luck might fail because they don't have good work ethics and people lacking the fortune might be successful regardless. And even if luck plays a big role on some success stories, good work ethics is indispensible and more essential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...work ethics like good managment skills, the he will have a low chance to be able to ut...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... penicilin was used to treat the wounded during D-Day in 1944 when the ally force...
^^
Line 7, column 530, Rule ID: ALLY_ALLAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allay'?
Suggestion: allay
... wounded during D-Day in 1944 when the ally forces storm the beach of Normandy. Peo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eople with luck might fail because they dont have good work ethics and people lackin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2888.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 596.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84563758389 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65198987801 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469798657718 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2089661225 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171331247172 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490743516409 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572147705371 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114149771681 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641896401697 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.