The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
It is irrefutable that scientific advancements have made the lives of mankind comfortable, safe, and serene. Technological advancements and the invention of new pieces of equipment have given ample amount of time for people to work for their personal and professional development. However, these expediences have made people a bit lazy nowadays. But still, it does not make individuals weaker and dependent on machines. The outline of the claim is a contentious issue and needs a scrupulous and cogent analysis along with a lucid enunciation.
To begin with, the invention of machines helped us greatly in doing mundane tasks and giving time to spend with family or focus on work. This leisure time could be used to pursue their hobbies or could start a side hustle. Many people now started a side hustle in the field of digital marketing and advertisement becoming independent. They started fledgling their career along with their 9-5 job. This is plausible because of the conveniences we have that would reduce people wasting time on humdrum works.
Furthermore, earlier women were not independent as the women in the modern era. Women were confined within the boundary of the kitchen, doing household chores and taking care of family. They were not even properly educated and did not go to work to prove their ability. After the invention of machines like microwave, the washing machine, mixer grinder, vacuum cleaner, taking care of household chores is easier and women started educating themselves and now most of the women are equally competitive in all the fields and have acquired higher positions equal to men. Therefore, the privileges of contemporary life have made women break the label of weaker individuals and proved that they are mentally, physically, and emotionally stronger and independent.
Even though people are mostly getting the help of machines, it does not make them weaker or dependent on these machines. Instead, some tools make people lazier, calculator’s make people forget the normal day-to-day mind calculations. Grammarly has made auto-suggestion easy and now people are not searching for appropriate words and vocabulary for forming sentences.
To put this enunciate in a nutshell, the outline of the claim seemed appealing at the first glance but after meticulous dissection of the sentence and through deeper analysis it is Clear that though people make use of the machines for doing quotidian tasks, it is not making them dependent individuals and weaker, rather, making them stronger and individualist.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31358024691 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87847018591 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535802469136 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3421742008 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.263157895 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101330220939 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316107239447 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320386672189 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536648228012 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107862397275 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.