The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
It is irrefutable that self-discipline and other moral behavior which was instilled in childhood would be followed by the person in the future as well. Making children understand the mere difference between the good and bad, the consequences of their deeds, and expounding how would a single person's actions influence society as a whole, would sow the seeds of goodness among the students. As lauding positive actions, elders should also reprimand kids for their negative actions. The outline of the assertion is a contentious claim and needs scrupulous and cogent analysis as well as lucid delineation.
Admittedly, appreciating the pleasing activities of the student would be a great encouragement factor for the committer as well as the audience, if it is applauded in front of fellow students and teachers. As the result, this would motivate other students to involve in such constructive activities. For instance, provided that a teacher exhibits charitable work done by one of the students to the class, the other fellow students would also consider doing this to be commendable and earn the respect of their teachers. Parents should be good role models for their children as kids would consider their father and mother as their elder self and would likely be the same in the future. Incorporating standard attitudes in a child's lifestyle by being a good human in society would make their descendants grow in the same way.
On the contrary, negative actions done by a student should not be ignored as there is a chance of committing the same crime again and again without even knowing that is an offense. It is the responsibility of the teacher or the parents to point out and admonish the kids for their immoral activity so as to prevent recidivism. It should be done as soon as the kid commits it for the first time, else they would have surpassed the stage of contrite and would start to enjoy the perks of being deceptive. To exemplify this, say a kid punched a fellow student for not giving his snack and the teacher also did not take this up much seriously, now the kid would start to enjoy the feeling that the other students getting intimidated by him. And when time passes, it would be difficult to deviate him from that thought. These kids as time passes would become criminals, if not looked after properly, and would be deleterious for the future society.
Consequently, along with intimating the bad attitude and disparaging, teachers or father or mother should also enunciate the outcome of the bad deed that the young one has involved. Without knowing the aftermaths of action and without a reasonable explanation given for why the act is prone to scolding and what is to be done to correct the mistakes, a kid will not be able to shift completely with a conscience. In addition to that, the individual should also be well informed about how one unreputed action influences the environment surrounding them. Any negative action's result, irrespective of having an immediate adverse effect, should be pinpointed. For example, a kid does not consider wasting water as an alarming one now, the human should be taught the consequence of him wasting the water now in the future.
To put the elucidation in a nutshell, every child is pure and identical when they are born. But, a person's virtues are decided based on the actions, their outcome, and the concomitant experiences they gain in their childhood phase, which would entrench firmly in the individual's mind. Therefore, as like lauding positive actions, elders should also admonish kids for their negative actions. Not giving necessary heed for the wrong things would create a serious problem in the behavior of the child and in turn is detrimental to society also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ish the kids for their immoral activity so as to prevent recidivism. It should be done a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 537, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...d and in turn is detrimental to society also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3122.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 629.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96343402226 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00798087137 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75909466038 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465818759936 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 963.9 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5403154935 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.083333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2083333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70833333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849764244432 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301324880788 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401294258649 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538586497081 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028359603057 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.