It is not uncommon to consider oneself diffrent from others we all are unique in our own way. The prompt suggest that the sole purpose of studying history is to mark one self diffrent from the people in past. In my point of view, I partially agree with the prompt and provide three reasons of support.
To begin, history is very crucial for understanding how we have evolved, history provides us with facts which we can leverage to our advantage. For instance, when nuclear bomb was dropped we during second world war Japan was devastated and humanity had a indelible taint. After the events of of the Herosima bomb humanity came to a conclusion of never using nuclear weapon which indeed shows how much we can learn from history. Moreover, it is in our best interest to learn from history as it can be our datum line. So we do not make the same mistakes.
Secondly, It is true that people living in older times were diffrent from people living this era but, there is no comparison between these two times. History is a subject which is greatly valued across the globe and, it is not because it draws comparisons between two diffrent times, It is valued based on the merit of the subject it self. history provides us plethora of knowledge in diversified fields. For instance, If it were not for the history we would have never known scientific theories which were developed in early 2000 BC, we would have never known the philosophy of Plato, and invention of the number Zero. History is not about just comparing people it provides ample of information to humanity and the turn of events.
To conclude, it is open ended discussion how to use history for our advantage but in my point of view history gives us ample of information about other fields than just comparison of people of diffrent times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... mark one self diffrent from the people in past. In my point of view, I partially agree...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng second world war Japan was devastated and humanity had a indelible taint. Afte...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Japan was devastated and humanity had a indelible taint. After the events of of...
^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed and humanity had a indelible taint. After the events of of the Herosima bomb huma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...had a indelible taint. After the events of of the Herosima bomb humanity came to a co...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 332, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...alued based on the merit of the subject it self. history provides us plethora of knowle...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: History
...ed on the merit of the subject it self. history provides us plethora of knowledge in di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67398119122 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44330772842 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8170488023 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192296084449 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673697736949 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525981343571 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118366100161 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360156046371 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.