The lecture states that Endotherms are the mammals that maintain their internal body temperature warm no matter what and provide the example that dinosaurs are endotherms and provide three proofs for the claim. However, the professor disagrees with the reading and provides three supporting counter reasons.
Firstly, the reading claims that the polar dinosaurs were endotherms and claims that only mammals who are endotherms can survive such a cold and harsh climate. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the polar region was not that cold during these time when dinosaurs were around and another possible explanation provided by the professor was that dinosaurs could have migrated during the winter so avoid such harsh climate and the existence of polar dinosaurs does not necessarily mean that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Secondly, the reading claims that the dinosaur’s leg position has a correlation with it being endothermic as the physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity. However, the professor opposes this point of view by stating that the position of the leg in dinosaurs has anything but the correlation with them being endothermic. The Professor explains that the position of legs did not proof and it only states
Thirdly, the bone structure has a relation with endothermy that the bone structure of dinosaurs has Haversian canals that is they have blood vessels that allow them to grow quickly. However, the professor argues against this point and states that the presence of this bone structure is not proof enough and states that the bones in dinosaurs had rings which occurs after aging which helps to prove that dinosaurs were not endothermic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...endotherms and claims that only mammals who are endotherms can survive such a cold and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws sustained physical activity. However, the professor opposes this point of view...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36666666667 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61777452891 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485185185185 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.7910356807 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.125 110.228320801 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.75 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186426850489 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960663568465 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120085903838 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124124573372 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991396500895 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.3589403974 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.