Some people like to do only what they already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

We are in an era which is constantly evolving and we need to keep abreast of things which are happening around. Some hold an opinion that its better to do what we do instead of trying out new things while, others argue that it's better to try things as it helps us evolve and gain experience. In my point of view, it's better to try out new things for the following three reason.

First, after a certain point as life gets monotonous trying out new things kicks the boredom out of your life and gets your blood pumping again. This new learning experience can be anything from learning how to cook to flying an airplane. For instance, when I usually get bored I try out new cooking recipe which helps me relax, the recipe not always pans out as i thought it would but still it gives me my peace that I tried something new today. while some people are way to comfortable in their current position that they are to afraid to change any details of their life.

Secondly, trying out new things helps us to evolve and make us a better person. These new risks define a new course for us even though the learning experience might be negative but and in a big view they always add positive points to us you can always learn from your mistakes. For instance, breaking the routine can be as small as taking the bus instead of a cab to office which can help you save money and it can be as big as changing career.

Thirdly, this quality of risk taking nature is very rewarding. For instance many CEO,CTO and managers have this trait and in general many successful people have risk taking which makes them stand out of the others.

To conclude, change is always good and should always be accepted with a positive attitude and we should always be curious to try out new things

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...elax, the recipe not always pans out as i thought it would but still it gives me ...
^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...peace that I tried something new today. while some people are way to comfortable in t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...peace that I tried something new today. while some people are way to comfortable in t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...in their current position that they are to afraid to change any details of their l...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese new risks define a new course for us even though the learning experience migh...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun CEO seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
... nature is very rewarding. For instance many CEO,CTO and managers have this trait and in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , CTO
...is very rewarding. For instance many CEO,CTO and managers have this trait and in gen...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42201834862 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20680292392 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5596468812 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207844545564 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075788684546 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503394204 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108340696352 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576698834674 0.0645574589148 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 58.1214874552 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.