The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is the study of history being all about dispelling the illusion between previous and nowadays people? I think history is the study of past people and their activities. I am partial to the view of the author because of the following reasons:
History is the resource of different ideas. As we can easily access history from the book, internet, etc, we can have an idea of different things. For example, from the history of Thomas alfa addition, we can know that we should do our work continues even after the failure so many times. We can learn from the past and implement it in the future.
History also warns us from doing something wrong. For instance, the history of world war I and II tell us that war doesn't provide benefit to anyone. Also, the history of the corona is another example that however, humankind gets the apex of success, nature is always above us. We should always prepare for different natural challenges.
However, the view shown by the author is also somehow right. There are so many illusions between today and previous people. There must be clear between the two people from two different eras. This can be done only after the study of history. But this is not the main benefit of history. There are lots of other benefits that we can have of history.
In the end, history is the shed of different ideas and it also helps us to warn us from repetitively doing the wrong thing. These things are the main benefits of history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author because of the following reasons: History is the resource of different ide...
^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... of world war I and II tell us that war doesnt provide benefit to anyone. Also, the hi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 259.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61776061776 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29581406321 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9894944365 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.4444444444 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.3888888889 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169063567067 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622656987978 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448771262204 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104115889093 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402640725739 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.92 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.