"In many countries it is now possible to turn on the television and view government at work.
Watching these proceedings can help people understand the issues that affect their lives. The
more kinds of government proceedings---trials, debates, meetings, etc.---that are televised,
the more society will benefit."
Today television has made feasible to overview the government credential and overall performance as a whole. These leads to understands the overall scenario to the common people as a whole and finally society will benefits. I am in support with the first part of the contention while conditional in both second and third portion of the contention. These media really leads communicates the information regarding the activities of rulling and opposition party, and their performances, however, today some of the media were found to broadcast the wrong information in the pursuit of money.
Television really makes access to reach the political circumstances to the normal people. Simply, a mediocre can understood what’s is going around him, how dramatically the country’s overall development has been takes place and finally he can creates decision in upcoming election. This telecision makes easy to understands the surrounding atmosphere. People can easily differentiates who and/or what is real benefactor. Any human society is obvious benifitted from these sorts of facilities of the television.
By the advantage of television, one can put forwards their views about the problems of their local communities and country as a whole as means of journalist. Thus, it can acts as a way to express their views in regards to any politician/leader. In our country, Nepal, there is a programme (Live talk with Prime Minister) which is held in every Saturday. By the means of this types of program, one put their views towards the national level. These types of programs-- and many debates can create the solution to the problem in any society.
However, in certain conditions, these media also gave sham news by the grafting. These media were found to denigrating some people in the process of venal. Thus, everything in media or a television ;whatsever is broadcast, it may not be credential. These types of scenario has been faced generally in th case of developing types of countries. There should be made strong laws for this kinds of behavior. Morever, many politicians and journalists who were interviewing in any national issues also seems frequently quarreling. This types of incident gives the wrong perceptions to the government and media in terms of citizens.
With the advancement of television, it should be fully exploited in positive aspects of any citizens life; neither to harm any person’s career and reputation—it would be beneficial to the society lies in the corner from the central government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...ple as a whole and finally society will benefits. I am in support with the first part of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... and their performances, however, today some of the media were found to broadcast the wrong...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...has been takes place and finally he can creates decision in upcoming election. This tel...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
...le as means of journalist. Thus, it can acts as a way to express their views in rega...
^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...an acts as a way to express their views in regards to any politician/leader. In our country, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...held in every Saturday. By the means of this types of program, one put their views t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... be credential. These types of scenario has been faced generally in th case of deve...
^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s. There should be made strong laws for this kinds of behavior. Morever, many politi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'give'.
Suggestion: give
...ntly quarreling. This types of incident gives the wrong perceptions to the government...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ly exploited in positive aspects of any citizens life; neither to harm any person's...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30521091811 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10112549804 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2546107581 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1818181818 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166228657828 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473002499243 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304878493417 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081240158223 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432152221399 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.