In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.
Management is a kind of art as well as science. Art is in relation to the allocation, while science is for investment. It is true that when any person involved in such types of activities fro his childhood, certainly he can progress up in his/her future. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essays.
To begin with, there is a proverb that the good plant has its shiny surface during the time of a seedling. That is, childhood reflects his future. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a child, during the time of the festival, I used to go to my uncle's house. There he gave a large sum of money. I kept all these sums into my share account. Nevertheless, this share goes on drastically increases in these last ten years. Today, at this time too, I use to invest my money in buying a share. Now, I am a millionaire. Unless I have done this from my young age, I would never reach this stage. This is all a result of the skill of managing resources effectively.
Finally, the next important thing for a human is the development of habits. Good habit always leads to the same in their upcoming habit. For instance, when a person was involved in saving money from his small life, he would follow in later periods of life. Consequently, a good manager is always good, and vice-versa. For instance, my friend's father worked in a foreign country. As a result, it would be difficult for his mother to manage the household resources. His mother always works championed to him in all sorts of work. This all results to become him a good administrator at a school recently. Currently, he is managing the different staff's role in a college and provides a salary to the teacher in time with a good level of accountability.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that a person would be an economically responsible person if he used to enroll in such types of activities from his early life. This is because it brings up to the sustainability in any person's life and because investing or managing certain inputs would give a good output in his future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...on involved in such types of activities fro his childhood, certainly he can progres...
^^^
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... ten years. Today, at this time too, I use to invest my money in buying a share. N...
^^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'staffs'' or 'staff's'?
Suggestion: staffs'; staff's
...Currently, he is managing the different staffs role in a college and provides a salary...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... brings up to the sustainability in any persons life and because investing or managing ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52230971129 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77750317254 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530183727034 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3876238795 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.2692307692 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6538461538 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091748984927 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261527557642 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297548202402 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509026562774 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237429404739 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 11.7677419355 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.34 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.