Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
From the very beginning of our human civilization people were very eager to know the reasons of natural occurrence and at many stages of their life they fill need of something and invent their way to fulfill their need by using their extraordinary sense. Here in the prompt it is stated that many important discoveries are accidental. I strongly disagree with this statement for mainly two reasons.
Firstly, most of the discoveries are done just because of our need. Now our need is obvious, we know clearly about our needs, to fulfill this need some special human we call them scientist or engineer research to find a way to fulfill that particular need. For instance, in hot country it is need something that keep their living places cool or they need something to preserve their food from this hot weather. Once scientist know the demand they started to research how to invent a machine that can cool hot weather. By using thermodynamics law and different physical science scientists invent air conditioner and refrigerator. It is clear from the example that creation air conditioner and refrigerator is not accidental rather it is a systematic procedure by which scientists able to invent these for fulfilling a particular need.
Secondly, most of the scientific theories discovered by arising questions and answering those questions. For example, we all know about the story of Sir Isac Newton about how he discover gravity: once he sit down under a apple tree and suddenly an apple fall down, then he asked himself why it has fallen down and then he discover gravitation by started to answering that question. It is not accidental rather it is his systematic way of answering his question. We all know about Einstein how he discover his great theory ‘ theory of relativity’. How can anyone say that is accidental.
At last, few discovery like radioactivity by Kuri may be accidental. But, almost every discovery and creation in this world is the result of systematic research and development. A car, smart phone, internet, spaceship, sting theory, theory of relativity can not be accidental.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...serve their food from this hot weather. Once scientist know the demand they started ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sits'.
Suggestion: sits
... about how he discover gravity: once he sit down under a apple tree and suddenly an...
^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iscover gravity: once he sit down under a apple tree and suddenly an apple fall d...
^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'discovers'.
Suggestion: discovers
...self why it has fallen down and then he discover gravitation by started to answering tha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86056937389 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.864320607 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11572107869 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432197558234 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418284824996 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647893556611 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206280647379 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.