Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Discoveries or inventions always had a major impact on society. Discovery of anything leads to the development of something. The discoveries help people a lot in enhancing their knowledge spectrum. Discoveries always act as an important part for an invention because while seeking answer to one question it also provides answers of another.
To begin with, the discoveries or creations help the mankind to ease the mundane work. The discoveries of some popular people cannot be mitigated by stating the discovery to be accidental. For example, Bill gate had the vision and trenchant to reach beyond the boundaries. He is highly educated and knowledgeable to create such software. Ingenuity is the source of inventing such propitious products.
Secondly, there are some diligent scientists which cannot be relegated. Creation from scientists motivates us to change the future. Let us consider an example, Thomas Edison who had failed more than 100 times before discovering electric bulb. His gumption to achieve his goal without giving up has led to such jubilant discovery. With the help of such discovery we have further introduced light saving bulbs and coloured bulbs to amplify our progress.
However, there are some discoveries which improvident from critics. Discoveries always provide various byproducts for other researches. It is undeniable that many great discoveries or creations are accidental. Considering a great scientist Sir Isaac Newton, was a mathematician physicist, who discovered Earth’s gravity. Everyone thinks that he discovered gravity when an apple accidentally falls on his head and through which he is able to comprehend the pull in the earth. But, in reality through this accident he discovered another theory of an existing force that is required to change the speed or direction of a moving object on which he written theories. After further experimentation he wrote his theories of gravity. Most of the time discoveries or creations occur accidentally.
To sum up, discovery is nothing but an identification of something. Discovery leads to comprehend an arcane thing may be existing in the universe. So, if someone is start doing work considering repercussions then it is difficult to implement a system. Because, once the prediction is negative then it is difficult to convert it to positive. Most of the time, results changes or invention of things occurs accidentally. Most of the time, researches produce byproducts or result of other researches accidentally which always leads to the creation of another innovative thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 662, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng object on which he written theories. After further experimentation he wrote his th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... thing may be existing in the universe. So, if someone is start doing work considering...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08204072004 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1244560987 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4285714286 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2857142857 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60714285714 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20257381424 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480790351153 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681011481826 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109996048727 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802010255889 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.