There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Today, extinction of species is a big problem in ecology. The number of species in the world has been decreasing since humans started to develop the nature. Wildlife has lost its habitat and has been hunted indiscriminately by people.
To begin with, there have been abundant of deleterious effects on planet earth. There are handful of people who have solicitude towards environment problems. The effects of environment have desecrated some animals and plants. There has been extinction of few distinct animals. Deforestation to build houses and convenient roads led the animals and plants endangered. There are lot of small things which government can resolve. Public transportation can be insightful decision to outcast the private vehicles. These vehicles have caused a lot of pollution to the environment.
Secondly, the contributions from all over the world to develop not only economic situations but to preserve forests and animals have been impeding. There was an extinction of West Bengal tigers earlier. Even the educated people weren’t aware of such difficulties. IN addition, the floods in Japan have led all the resources and animals to endanger. There must be proper planning and cogent ideas to tackle all the difficulties environment faces.
However, there are few celebrities who help the environment to maintain their wear and tear. For example, Leonardo Dicaprio who donated more than 5 million dollars for the burning of Amazon Rain forest. This job contains more than one person to take initiative to come forward and do the right thing. Even if we earn millions of dollars there are of no use for tomorrow.
Efforts for saving endangered species may disturb the ecosystem. However, not protecting the species may cause bigger problems--such as food shortage--to human beings. Therefore, we should make efforts to save the species to the extent that the efforts do not severely disturb the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | AtharvaKale | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Sumilak | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Siam | 66 | view |
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 50
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline students cannot be motivated by school or college alone 50
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of an action are more important than the inten 54
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...ious effects on planet earth. There are handful of people who have solicitude towards e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'difficulties'' or 'difficulty's'?
Suggestion: difficulties'; difficulty's
...ning and cogent ideas to tackle all the difficulties environment faces. However, there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do not severely disturb the ecosystem.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31045751634 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88073888085 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1138384396 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.652173913 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3043478261 23.4991977007 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158666079422 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403861341335 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647107611631 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817667189828 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724940987481 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.63 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.