Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It requires enormous experience and greater understanding for a person to master a skill or a process. Connoisseurs, unlike amateurs know the subject to its core. They have the ability to pinpoint the problems in a project and come up with solutions. Hence, I align with the author of the prompt that a critical evaluation coming from the expert holds high value and following are the three main reasons which are going to support my stance.
An expert knows the complete picture of a product or a process. He sees various components working simultaneously. An uninitiated may not have that kind of understanding with the process. In research field, many discoveries would have gone unnoticed had the lead scientists not observed the findings of the research assistants. Although the assistants are highly educated and have science degrees and have been working for some time, however, they nevertheless lack the expertise to evaluate the results of their own finding. They miss out the important findings and discoveries go unreported. Our world would have not seen artificial sweeteners had Mr. David, the leading scientist at University of Deltas not tasted the sucrose which was serendipity product in one of the experiments that went awry. That's why it is tantamount to have experts and their feedback is crucial in any field.
Experts because of their immense experience have tried and tested every aspect of the process. They know the what's the best timing to execute a certain operation. They know the implications if things aren't done the way they are supposed to be done. Military top officials all over the globe since decades have been leading their forces. They don't send their forces on fight unless they know they have an upper hand over the enemy. This kind of expertise is of the highest value as so many lives and harmony in the world is on the stake. One wrong step and chaos everywhere.
Moreover, there is a natural proclivity among people to listen to people who have spend years knowing the process. In any field, people tend to listen to the experts and does not give attention if expertise comes from colleagues or juniors. Expertise coming from a junior is especially ridiculed and taken as offense. It does more harm than benefit. People take such judgements on their ego. Hence, no matter how good a judgement is, if it goes ignored, it loses all its potential.
Given that, I acknowledge the scenarios where my position might not hold true. By the way of example, experts lack the fresh eye to suggest improvements that might be very helpful. Experts sometimes are adamant to any kind of change of in years of hard work. However, these two examples are rare and can be easily taken care of if expert change their attitude a little bit and give opportunity to others and welcome new perspectives. To sum up, experts lead the world, and their critical evaluation is irreplaceable to its growth and prosperity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... one of the experiments that went awry. Thats why it is tantamount to have experts an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ry aspect of the process. They know the whats the best timing to execute a certain op...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...n. They know the implications if things arent done the way they are supposed to be do...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es have been leading their forces. They dont send their forces on fight unless they ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ong people to listen to people who have spend years knowing the process. In any field...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
...nts that might be very helpful. Experts sometimes are adamant to any kind of change of in yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...re of if expert change their attitude a little bit and give opportunity to others and welc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, kind of, by the way, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92570281124 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68003390511 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7278312563 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7666666667 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76666666667 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0568750118237 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0153512968469 0.0831039109588 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239847445079 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345442518403 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293315134758 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.