Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The given statemnt explains that the discoveries or creations would occur accidentaly when we look for solution to some other issues. The creations or discoveries in any field would depends on the research. Everyone knows that the research can not take definite path due to the uncertainities. It could be possible to find solution to the problem, which had formed long before, when we work on the curret problem. Therefore we cannot work in any certain direction to create or discover the intended one at the first attempt.
The discovery of any thing not only the scientific possesses uncertainity. In the olden days people are interested in finding India which had abundent of wealth. As it is evident from the history that Columbus started to find India. In the process of doing so he discovered America and he thought initially that it is India. The reasons could be that in the olden days the navigation systems are difficult to interpret. In addtion, he tried to discover via sea routes. Traveling through seas possess difficulties such as storms, continuous raining, etc. Therefore it is formidable to sail in a correct direction using the olden navigation system. These factors could be one of the resons of Columbus deviation to discover America instead of India. So, it is evident that the dicovery in any field possess challenges which makes to deviate one to discover the unintented one.
Further, in scientific community scientists form the problem based on the availble literature. They usualy thought that the solution to the problem would fetch them the intended outcome or creation. However, any human mistake or the change in nature of the behaviour of the material would make them to end with creating the unintended one. The scientists works in few narrow areas. Therefore, their research are interconnected. So, the working in particular topic can be related to the other as well as the findings can be used or related to the other problem. Therefore, it is possible that unknowingly the working on particular problem could be influenced from the failure of past problems. Hence, in the research of the current issue fetch the solution to the pevious long standing problems.
As seen in the earlier paragraphs that the creation or discovery can not take the definite path. Therefore, finding the solution of the intended peoblem could result to finding the solution to the previous one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where the 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 20
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 16
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...tions or discoveries in any field would depends on the research. Everyone knows that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...re, when we work on the curret problem. Therefore we cannot work in any certain direction...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... the first attempt. The discovery of any thing not only the scientific possesses uncer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing India which had abundent of wealth. As it is evident from the history that Col...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'work'.
Suggestion: work
...ting the unintended one. The scientists works in few narrow areas. Therefore, their r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06516290727 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75737293599 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7391548109 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.84 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.96 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886142410898 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251999134193 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302511623114 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604224931194 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029332345384 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.