"Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read would cost Acme only $500 per employee—a small price to pay when you consider the benefits. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit greatly by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author here argues that the acme publishing company wants their employees to take the easy speed Reading course that would benefit the company in various aspects. To espouse his argument the author claims that many other companies have greatly improved the productivity having their employees to take this course. Moreover, author adduces that One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. In addition to these the author also claims that the cost of course very low ,$500 per employee including three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Plausibly, above argument seems true to some extent but it suffers several minor flaws and has various setbacks.
The primary issue with the argument lies in its unsubstantiated theory, the authors gratuitous assumption is based on impertinent comparison that acme would be benefited from the course similar to other companies. However, he has not compared the overall existing problems and situation of acme with other companies and it what ways the course helped to overcome those.
The secondary issue with the argument lies when author cites an example of a graduate getting benefited from the course. Firstly it is certainly not germane to judge the effectiveness of the course on the basis of minute details, It can be highly probable that the graduate would be deft enough in other skills to reach to the acme in years. Perhaps a sharp and detailed research would have it more patent to decide the efficacy of course.
The tertiary issue with the argument lies in the reasoning that the course would be good to opt for because of its low price and additional subscriptions, Again the relevancy of the claim can be considered sub-par since it does not render details compared to another courses and based on various criteria other than price.
Hence to Sum up the aforementioned claims does not provide ammunition to its conjecture in a whole, argument would been given more weight-age if it would considered the holistic factors buttressed with depth of data.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author here argues that the acme publishing company wants their ...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to take the easy speed Reading course that would benefit the company in variou...
^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is course. Moreover, author adduces that One graduate of the course was able to r...
^^
Line 1, column 607, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... claims that the cost of course very low ,00 per employee including three-week sem...
^^
Line 1, column 812, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtent but it suffers several minor flaws and has various setbacks. The prima...
^^
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate would be deft enough in other skills to reach to the acme in years. Perhaps a...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ous criteria other than price. Hence to Sum up the aforementioned claims doe...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 116, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...s conjecture in a whole, argument would been given more weight-age if it would consi...
^^^^
Line 19, column 155, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
... been given more weight-age if it would considered the holistic factors buttressed with de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, in addition, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09340659341 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62333005633 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0811588692 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32508728436 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118559848814 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121915114718 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146473600035 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170207932827 0.0667264976115 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.