Many of the world’s lesser known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The government of the countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from being extinct.
The speaker asserts that the government of the countries should act to preserve world’s endangered languages from being extinct. Considering the importance of such fewer spoken language, I agree with the prompt that such languages should be preserved; however, government has a more pressing duties towards nation and the people residing in it, it should focus more on public well-beings rather than on preserving such languages.
Language is not only the means of communication, but also a part-and-parcel of cultural heritage. It is an important asset of the nation that gives a unique identity to it. Therefore, if a particular language of a nation gets extinct, the nation loses its identity and pride to some extent. In this sense, language of a country should be preserved from being extinct.
A particular type of language carries a distinct idea and emotion that no other language carries accurately in a precise way. The ideas and theme of such diminished language present in literature and historical documents can be translated into commonly used popular language; however, complete sensible translation is not possible. For instance, the English version novel “The Blue Mimosa” of Parijaat cannot raise the exact emotions, sentiment, and the excitement in the readers as that by its original Nepali version. It is simply because the English version of that novel lacks the exact sweetness present in the abstract ideas of original Nepali version. There remain subtle nuances in the expression of the ideas, emotions and sentiment while translating the novel into other popular languages.
Further, because of the extinction of many ancient languages, researchers and the archeologists are unable to decode the inscriptions present in the stones, metals and some other historical documents discovered in the archeological sites. Such historical documents could provide profound knowledge about human civilization, past events, scientific accomplishments, culture and traditions of the past era. However, since such language has been already extinct, nobody could decode it, and the cryptic historical documents remained as a great mystery to modern humans. It is therefore preservation of the lesser known languages is imperative.
However, in spite of the great advantages in the preservation of such recondite endangered languages, government has more pressing duties towards the nation and the well being of the people residing in it. Being a general public, I believe that government should focus primarily upon the issues regarding public health, social security, healthy food and water, quality education and the like fundamental issues. Since many of the countries in the world are living under dire poverty and extreme misery, government of the nation should heed on these issues rather than on preserving these diminished languages. Government of a nation should focus more on providing better health and quality education to the people as vital educated people are the only backbone of the nation responsible for its development.
In conclusion, I concede that preservation of the lesser known languages could be advantageous to reveal the exact ideas and information depicted by such languages; however, government has more pressing duties to heed on. I believe that the government of a nation should focus primarily upon the general well being of the nation and the people residing in it, and give high precedence on these issues rather than preserving such esoteric languages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a precise way" with adverb for "precise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at no other language carries accurately in a precise way. The ideas and theme of such diminished...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...g of the people residing in it. Being a general public, I believe that government should focus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2971.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47145488029 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9283516864 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447513812155 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 939.6 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2459801826 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.476190476 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368853756444 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124402079691 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114536113867 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214569088406 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106222366368 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.