Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
I agree with the statement that the internet has caused the people's attention span to get shorter. While watching television or surfing in the internet, people tend to move from one content to another in a second with the click in their mobile or in television remote. With the increasing content in the media and internet, individual can watch any sort of content they want or they are interested in. The mass media make it easy for the people to understand different sort of things all around the glove staying in one corner of a nation. But I did not agree with the statement that it has positive effect on the individual as it has make people less attentive and reducing the people ability to focus.
Before the social media, people used to come together discuss about the family matter have a family dinner together which make the people more social and understanding. People used to focus on one thing that requires the most attention and try to solve the issue, they were more attentive and more social. They used to discuss problem with their family and try to solve together.
With the emergence of the mass media and the internet, people has become distant than ever. Children, parents, and every other individual are more invested in the social media then their own family. Though one can get whatever information they want from the internet, people are becoming more lazy and dumb then ever. Instead of being more invested in the creative work that help to flourish the individual knowledge, they are becoming more lazy and wasting their time in useless things.
People are losing their ability to focus on one thing as their are a lot of other options in internet. If they get bored in one thing they are watching or looking after, they shift to another content which might be more interesting than the first one. So they end of learning only the surface of different content and never get into the deep of those things. This behavior can also be seen in the people job. They are never satisfied with the job and end up working in different job and not focus on one good job.
Finally i like to point the fact that event though there is huge possibility of getting success with the use of mass media and internet but it has slowly becoming the bane of the human kind. I do not support the statement mass media has overall positive effect as it is making people less attentive and more distant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...tement that the internet has caused the peoples attention span to get shorter. While wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... their ability to focus on one thing as their are a lot of other options in internet....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ent job and not focus on one good job. Finally i like to point the fact that event tho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...and not focus on one good job. Finally i like to point the fact that event thoug...
^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man kind. I do not support the statement mass media has overall positive effect a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, then, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63785046729 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28944662687 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432242990654 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7879256631 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470183422296 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15968400986 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925874510189 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265350465659 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819438579312 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.