Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

The physical attributes of men and women are different, and this is a fact that almost everyone will agree with. However, due to their different physicality, are they suitable to different tasks? The answer to this question, according to me, is yes. Men and women have different body strengths which makes them compatible with different tasks. In work places where sheer strength is the requirement, male domination is seen. Then there are some jobs where not body strength but a more agile workflow is required, this is where women come into play. These two areas can throw some light in favor of this argument.

First of all, in work places where body strength play a vital role, it is generally observed than male workers are dominant in number than their female counterpart. In construction work, for example, it is generally seen that men carry bricks from one place to another as carrying bricks requires a sheer amount of strength. Moreover, in these jobs, women can be seen preparing materials such as concrete as this work does not require a lot of physical strength. From this example it can be seen that both men and women perform different jobs, a job where their strength would allow them to work for longer durations than would have been possible otherwise.

Secondly, in jobs where a more nimble hand is the requisite, female domination is observed as far as the number of employees is concerned. For example, a hospital generally has more female obstetricians than their male counterpart. An obstetrician's job does not reqiure him or hir to be very strong, rather it is the opposite that is more advantageous. Child birth is a very delicate process which requires less power on the obstetrician's side. So, females are more suited for this job as they are inherently less powerful than the males. From this example it is clear that in a delicate job such as this, having strenght does not gurantee success. Here also, due to their different physicality, men and women are differently suited.

In conclusion, some may say that people can adapt to different jobs and that women of the modern world are as powerful, if not more, as the men are, but it is not true for the entire world. Yes, women are increasingly gaining strength, but this is not on a universal scale. Women of the third world countries are still lacking strength posessed by the men of such countries, so, in these places and some of the more developed countries as well, both of them are differently suited for many tasks. Therefore, due to their different strength they

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: dominant
...enerally observed than male workers are dominant in number than their female counterpart. In const...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...such countries, so, in these places and some of the more developed countries as well, both ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, due to their different strength they
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, third, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84054669704 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62974361806 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453302961276 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8226909758 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5909090909 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209099216133 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656720181097 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595491398736 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141316533543 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388176114863 0.0667264976115 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.