Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In contemporary American society, people could observe many human right movements on gender issues. Among these movements, "equal pay for equal work" might be one with the greatest influence among the public. According to varies studies, females are statistically paid less than males in a similar job, sometimes for 20 percent or more. Some might argue that men are more suited to work in some occupations, which could lead to them having a higher salary. This argument might stand in some cases, but it should be acknowledged that the inherent physical differences of genders are not the main cause of men and women having varied abilities in tasks.
The first point to raise is that men and women, although born with differed adaptability to physical tasks, are not necessarily affected by their inherent differences in today's world. Although it is true that men generally generate more testosterone than women and grows more muscle than their female counterpart, it is clear that there is no such thing as a "limit" preventing women to be suitable for the physical tasks that men do. The limit of female's physical capability could be best measured by the Olympic records, which clearly shows that the upper boundary of female and male physical abilities are quite similar. While this does speak to the inherent physical differences between men and women, it is clear that the physical occupations of the 21st-century do not require workers to push themselves to the boundary of mankind. In other words, there is no inherent limitation for females to be as suited as males in physical occupations.
People might point to the inherent differences in the existence of the menstrual cycle and the need for childbirth as a reason for the question of suitability. Undeniably, females' efficiency in numerous tasks would be affected during their cycle and pregnancy. These handicaps, however, is the necessary sacrifice for humanity to survive, and is unfair to use as an indicator of capability problems of a certain gender. When statistically analyzing the efficiency of male and female workers when the females are not handicapped by the menstrual cycle, on the other hand, many studies found that the effectiveness of female workers is as high as their male counterparts.
This argument is not aiming to claim that men and women are equally suited for all task, as such a difference does exist in our society. For example, average men are statistically stronger than average women, while the college graduation rate for females is constantly higher than male college students. However, this might be more of a result of many social stereotypes than differences in genes.
In conclusion, men and women do have inherent physical differences, and might not be equally suited for all tasks, but there are most likely no causal relations between these two different observations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'vary'.
Suggestion: vary
...nfluence among the public. According to varies studies, females are statistically paid...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is clear that there is no such thing as a 'limit' preventing women to b...
^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is as high as their male counterparts. This argument is not aiming to claim tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2433.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17659574468 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88218093696 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459574468085 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7338906234 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246863484313 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882476270546 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506153021482 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156227043995 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508790363256 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.