Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In today's overwhelming world, equality and justice among men and women is a challenging topic which experts are dealing with for decades. According to the writer, due to their inherent physical differences, all tasks are not suitable for both sides. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concern, people differ dramatically in their attitudes towards this issue. Although both sides have their pros and cons, it seems to be a cogent claim which I generally - yet not entirely -agree because not only has periods profound effect on women's performances, but also women are intrinsically weaker than men which leading them to be suitable for different kinds of tasks. However, some may protest that this is not a valid claim in certain circumstances.
First and foremost, periods causes women to emotionally be more vulnerable during the time o. According to a statistical reseach has been done at Arizona University, during the period time, women become more emotional and decide more based on their emotions rather than their rational. Therefore, this makes it a little bit hard for women to be completely rational all the time during doing their tasks, if it is necessary for them to be one hundred percent reasonable in their jobs. Nonetheless, according to some psychological research done by some psycholigists in Shahid Beheshti university, periods can increase level of passion and emotion which may help women to be suitable for the tasks that needs employees to see a problem from different perspective and consider all other aspects rather than pure mathematic and rational concern.
Additionally, the nature of the anatomy and body muscle of women is not as strong and big as men. It goes without saying that due to the release of Testestron in the bodies of men, their bodies can produce more protein and consequently more muscle than men. As a result, men are physically more suitable for jobs like bodygaurding and so on. in fact, women should try much harder and put much more time and effort in order to build their muscles and become as strong as men. However, due to several improvement in medical industries, there are several medical available for women to make this problem up and by injecting Testestron to their bodies, they could work out on their bodies with high productivity regarding building muscles and become strong enough to take participate in jobs like bodygauding and so on.
All in all, whether all the jobs are suitable for both men adn women is a controversial topic. As clarified above, I somewhat agree that because of their inherent physical differences all jobs are not suitable for both sides; Nonetheless, that there are many exceptions in my theory and there are many professional women out there that are much more productive than men eventhough they have challenges because of periods and their less strengh phisically compared to men.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ir rational. Therefore, this makes it a little bit hard for women to be completely rationa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10251046025 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78448662935 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502092050209 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.68879965 60.3974514979 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.4375 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256317349912 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939164557451 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618099260446 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172571939166 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676724040292 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.