Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
The issue of men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks is arguable one. On the one hand both men and women are excelling in all areas and reaching summit of success. While, on the other they are regarded as not suitable for many tasks, because of their physical appearance and skills. However, I agree with the author’s statement because it has a lot of valid reasons.
Firstly, men and women both have hormonal difference that differs them in physical appearance, strength
and emotions. Women by nature are more emotional than men. So work that involves contentious arguments and sometimes violence. It would be easier for a man to perform that job than a woman. Of course, we are talking about a majority of the individuals over here, but men by nature have that audacity to adapt to such situations quickly. For example, a police officer working in a crime department has to deal with such situations most of the time. So in such a case many times it is easier for men to adapt to such working culture than women.
Secondly, men generally do have more physical strength than women. Some tasks are arduous to be
performed by a woman. In such a cases many times it is observed that same task can be performed by man easily as compared to woman. For example, Coal mines requires workers to continue to perform heavy tasks which might be exhaustive for woman.
Some people might argue that, after training and practice required skills and stamina can be achieved and
both men and women can perform any task. That is true, we have many examples with us but, here I am talking about majority of the people. The productivity increases if each gender performs task that suits their
physical appearance and skills.
While there are arguments to be made from both the sides there are more valid reasons to why men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Hence in the final analysis I agree with the author's statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs them in physical appearance, strength and emotions. Women by nature are more e...
^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than women. Some tasks are arduous to be performed by a woman. In such a cases ma...
^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a case' or simply 'cases'?
Suggestion: a case; cases
...s to be performed by a woman. In such a cases many times it is observed that same tas...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which might be exhaustive for woman. Some people might argue that, after trai...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch gender performs task that suits their physical appearance and skills. While...
^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...are not equally suited for many tasks. Hence in the final analysis I agree with the ...
^^^^^
Line 14, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... in the final analysis I agree with the authors statement.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, of course, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82719546742 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49450438827 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490084985836 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9424540064 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.97078651685 201% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464903091862 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143066744513 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185039805744 0.0758088955206 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189044832789 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206018160431 0.0667264976115 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.