The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Understanding contemporary culture has never been an easy task to accomplish, since it has very different aspects to take into account. One way of trying to understand it might be by analyzing youth's trends, but that is not enough in order to get a complete depiction of the culture on a particular period of time. Analyze youth's trends is indeed very important, but also compare them to older generation's is essential to have a full picture of the culture of a partiular society.
What young commonly prefer to do is what carachterizes their generation. It is very useful to understand the evolution of contemporary culture, but it is not enough for studying how a society is now, in this moment of time. For example, young people of the 21st century have a new and unprecedent sensibility towards the imminent climate crisis and the human rights that are still missing in our society. It is something that shapes our culture now, of course. However, it is in some decades that it will be the main influence of the current society, so it is mainly useful to track how a culture will evolve and alone is not sufficient to analyze it in the present.
What is also important to note is the fact that youth's trends are also shaped by adults', whether they conform to or harshly clash with them. As the example above suggest, it is common to see nowadays that these new sensibilities of the younger generations do not get on well with the older ones. There is always discussion between these topics of climate and human rights, so it is important to take older generations' values and trends in order to get a full depiction of how multiple groups push to prevaricate others. There is not only clash between trends, though. Just thinking about rock music, it is clear that young generations often take something of the older one. It can actually be some genres of music that were particularly inspiring, so this example of rock music shows how the younger generations wants to introduce into thei trends something that shaped the older generation. Nowadays the main genres are rap and alternative indie music, but no one disregards rock music, especially its well-known classic songs.
Throught this reasoning it has been plain to sight that contemporary culture cannot be understood only by looking for youths' trends, but all generation's trends should be taken into account. It is a common example the one with social networks, where instagram or tiktok are mainly used by young people, whereas facebook and twitter are preferred by older people. A full depiction of society cannot thus be achieved without al of the trends of its generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...epiction of the culture on a particular period of time. Analyze youths trends is indeed very i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85840707965 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70251490501 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464601769912 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3898198114 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136916387039 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446377665655 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337474846186 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942175826901 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378167183088 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.