The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
This combination of a graph of attendance and a price list shows how the various entertainment venues performed, according to their prices, in 2009.
By looking at the first graph, we can clearly depict how the number of people who attended sportive events is significantly lower than cinemas' attendance. Admissions in theme parks, although they are higher than sports', present the same discrepancy.
This difference in numbers could be explained by looking at the price list of these venues, which comprehends different tickets solutions: single ticket or family ticket. The family option is not extremely cheaper than a single ticket, so it is assumable that this offer did not play an impactful role in the attendance of these venues.
Starting from sports, football games are the most expensive ones, therefore it is presumable to say that these were the most requested sportive events and did not get a high attendance, due to their high price. Basketball and cricket, despite being quite cheap, did not engage more people. Theme parks have only a slightly higher attendance, although they may be organised targeting a more vast public. This could have to do with their high ticket price. Cinemas, the less costly option, gained the biggest popularity, probably because of the ticket cost.
In conclusion, we can see that cinemas gained the higher attendance thanks to their low ticket cost, whereas sports events and theme parks had, on average, expensive tickets that prevented many people from attending them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24489795918 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63732854878 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6865952857 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865535964094 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348484475736 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405561486179 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612592250443 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460571369682 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.