In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c

Essay topics:

In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Imagination is a powerful tool and has been one of the main facilitators behind humanity’s grandest inventions. The Wright brothers imagined of a machine that would allow them to fly, before they went through the process of actualizing that vision in real life. If people couldn't use imagination to conjure up some of the boldest human inventions such as a rocket that could take us to the moon or a tiny mechanic capsule that would allow us to explore the depths of the ocean, these magnificent things wouldn't exist in our modern-day world. However, without the knowledge or capabilities to actualize the things in people’s head, they remain nothing more than a pipedream. Furthermore, there are many instances where modern-day innovators and researchers have come to a standstill with their work because the required supplemental technology just isn't there yet. Hence, while imagination is a prerequisite to any great human innovation, it is near worthless if the means to pull it off are not possible.

Firstly, imagination is at the head of every great journey, be it a scientific discovery, an artistic masterpiece, or even a technological innovation. If people did not have the capability to think of a world much better than the one they currently lived in, they would have no motivation for progress or change. Take Elon Musk for example, the CEO of two multibillion dollars companies—SpaceX and Tesla—who was once called radical for his unorthodox ideas. While many people claimed that solar cars just couldn't compete in a predominantly gas-powered auto sector, Elon Musk imagined that it could be done. As a result, today hundreds of thousands of Teslas, solar-powered cars, have been sold, and the company continues to thrive. Elon Musk imagined that one day humans would live on Mars, and as a result, he has built SpaceX to help make that dream a reality. Therefore, imagination is crucial to every profession and academic field—people should be encouraged to think of bold new ideas that are outside of the box.

However, long before the Wright brothers or Elon Musk existed, there were plenty of people who would gaze up at the never-ending sky and hope to fly through it one day or even go beyond it to the stars. However, the technology to achieve those dreams just hasn't come around until the past century or so. While all those people before Musk and the Wright brothers have similarly imagined such bold ideas, these ideas were almost meaningless because they only existed in their heads. Centuries of physics and mechanics were the building blocks used to make the first airplane. While the Write brothers used their imagination to see just what tampering with those blocks could create, nothing could have been done without the blocks of knowledge themselves.

Furthermore, there are many modern-day hurdles researchers and innovators face, because the technology is just not there to support them yet. Take for example, a popular cryptographic algorithm known as the Shor's algorithm which has already been invented and proven to work perfectly on a quantum computer. A type of cryptographic algorithm that far outperforms any of the one's cryptographers currently use, however, without the technology present to build a fully working quantum computer, Shor's algorithm remains useless. Moreover, physicists, far before CERN was built, predicted the existence of the god particle through theoretical means. However, before CERN, the technology just didn't exist to prove that these hypotheses were indeed correct. Hence, technology, a fungible form of knowledge, is arguably just as crucial to achieving a dream as imagination is.

To conclude, while imagination is necessary and vital to any great invention or idea, it is meaningless if it is not properly supported by the knowledge and technology needed to bring it to life. However, imagination and knowledge are both equally important to any idea. People need bold ideas and visions to work towards a better world, and they need the knowledge and technology to help actualize their ideas and visions.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ing that vision in real life. If people couldnt use imagination to conjure up some of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... of the ocean, these magnificent things wouldnt exist in our modern-day world. However,...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 859, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e required supplemental technology just isnt there yet. Hence, while imagination is ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...any people claimed that solar cars just couldnt compete in a predominantly gas-powered ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...technology to achieve those dreams just hasnt come around until the past century or s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... used to make the first airplane. While the Write brothers used their imagination to see ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 687, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...wever, before CERN, the technology just didnt exist to prove that these hypotheses we...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3442.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 663.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19155354449 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07432619952 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93855628348 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481146304676 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1084.5 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9869010862 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.481481481 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791666917936 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244556320123 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239021045141 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0451856542956 0.150359130593 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169221661528 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.