In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c

As we are looking at the untold stars at night , we are amazed by how they are shining for us. This is the infinite universe we are living in, the science is the way for us to get recognized of it. While due to the infinity, as human beings for now we could not discover everything of the universe even if we are equiped with the most advanced technology. We are so small that we should awe for the infinity of the universe. So as my concern, in sicence and arts, or to be more comprehensive, in the professions and academic fields, the imagination is more important thatn knowledge. I will address my views as bellow.

To begin with, it is easy to conclude that the arts need more imaginations rather than knowledge. The arts is the way of creating new works by people, the works themselves represent the atuhors' opinion about aescetics and recognitions of the world around us. I belive many of us like me would be amazed by the appearance of Cornica, the work of Picasso. This kind of work would give us so many feelings about the work itself as well as the impression of the paintings of Picasso. While after introduced by the meaning of this work, we get to know this work was finished in the WAR II , as an anti-war paint showing in front of us. So we are amazed by both of the paint and the meaing inside due to the Picasso's imagination.

When it comes to the scientific field, it is true that there are so many archievements like theorems and theories were proved by famous scientists. Thus we can make more progress by learning the knowledge as the Einstein said standing on the shoulders of giants. We should be thankful to them as we benefit a lot from the disvoeries of our predeccedors. From the DNA gentic technology to the Quantum Mechanics, we are all making more success established on the thoeries of those scientist. From time to time, people all agreed with the saying that the knowledge is the power.

While how about the future? And how about the history without the Einsteins and Copernicus? Maybe the fate of human beings' would be another story. As we are still looking at the stars with no one questions that wheher they all orbits with the Earth? Or without the Theory of Relativity, we would not cast doubts on the world we are living in is the only place for human beings in that there are five-dimension even six or higher dimension space which we could not explain the questions that where we were , where we are and where we will be.
Here we are fortunate that we are living in the same world that we both had Einstein and Copernicus who explained the questions. More Important, they both had the imagination which guided them to find new discoveries. Of course they were standing on the shoulders of giants, too. (Woe for Copernicus) Thus the science field could not exist without imagination.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are looking at the untold stars at night , we are amazed by how they are shining f...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...nations rather than knowledge. The arts is the way of creating new works by people...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... recognitions of the world around us. I belive many of us like me would be amazed by the ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... me would be amazed by the appearance of Cornica, the work of Picasso. This kind ...
^^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...now this work was finished in the WAR II , as an anti-war paint showing in front o...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ories were proved by famous scientists. Thus we can make more progress by learning t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scientist' or 'those scientists'?
Suggestion: this scientist; those scientists
... success established on the thoeries of those scientist. From time to time, people all agreed w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Einsteins and Copernicus? Maybe the fate of human beings would be another story. ...
^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'orbit'
Suggestion: orbit
...h no one questions that wheher they all orbits with the Earth? Or without the Theory o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...explain the questions that where we were , where we are and where we will be. Her...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, while, kind of, of course, as well as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54011741683 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60589151017 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461839530333 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6923076923 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2307692308 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6538461538 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106380780466 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349747433421 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545189002969 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622872374519 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271583662025 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.