In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many people think that influential figures such as Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and many others achieved their success because they were capable of interacting with the world in a creative way that none of us are capable of doing. It is true that creativity plays a huge role in the incredible creations that these men brought to the world but on must not forget that knowledge is the backbone of all types of creations. The prompt states that, for the majority of people, creativity is a skill that is much more important than knowledge. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this idea and the reasons are as follows.
To begin, creativity without knowledge is empty. Many of us may have already experienced some sort of mental conundrum, where we thought about na incredible idea that would revolutionize the world as we know it. In fact, new ideas pop up in our minds everyday but you don't see everyone in your neighbourhood creating the next Tesla. This is because, in order for an idea to grow and flourish, people must be familiarized with the hard problems of the field, have a Strong foundation on the topics and finally, must be willing to fight for their creations. For instance, G. Cziffra was one of the most skilled pianists of the 20th century. He was born in east europe, both parents were amateur musicians. From an early age, he started showing musical prowess. He loved listening his older sister play the piano and would stand by her side and stare her play the piano for hours. One day his parents heard someone playing the piano and once they realized that it wasn`t their daughter, they thought it was someone that had broken in the house and was taunting them with a piano music. But, for their surprise, they saw baby Cziffra playing some melodies that he would often hear from the radio. He went to continue his studies at the Liszt conversatory, known for being one of the best music educations that one can achieve. He was known at the music circles as the reincarnation of Liszt, a former pianista and composer known for his geniousness and virtuoso. Cziffra atributes his fame to hard work and dedication, practicing for nearly 14 hours a day. This is to show that, despite his creative and inventive brain, he knew that to achieve the highest standard he needed to work hard and have proper knowledge. If Cziffra had not gone to numerous conservatories and studied piano with the best mentors, he would probably be playing piano at a casual level in bars or at home.
Admitttedly, knowledge without creativity is like a tank without its wheels, a powerful war machine capable of great disctruction and combat maneuvers that is stuck in the ground and can not move, can not go places. This is true especially when it comes to painters. For instance, Leonardo da Vinci is known for being a artist, painter, sculptor, scientist and philosopher. He was one of the greatest intellects of his time, showing that he had a great amount of knowledge of the world. But for Da Vinci, knowledge and creativity worked side by side, as he would explain to others that his inventions had creative ideas that were guided by what he knew. He would walk around the streets of Florence, looking at the constructions and the beauty of the city. The view would calm his nerves and help him explore his creative side. He would use these moments to think about his next sculptures and his next inventions. Similarly to da Vinci, Antonio Stradivari – an Italian violin maker from the 17th century – would also go to other places to be inspired. He would go to a dense forest in the northern parto f Italy, near Switzerland, to gather more wood for his violins and to look at nature. He used to say that his violins were the fruit of his imagination and creativity and, of course, many hours in his shop.
In conclusion, although creativity is not more importante than knowledge, it is a very important side of the majority of inventors. Creativity and knowledge are best when they cooperate with one another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a creative way" with adverb for "creative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e capable of interacting with the world in a creative way that none of us are capable of doing. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... In fact, new ideas pop up in our minds everyday but you dont see everyone in your neigh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...as pop up in our minds everyday but you dont see everyone in your neighbourhood crea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e, Leonardo da Vinci is known for being a artist, painter, sculptor, scientist an...
^
Line 5, column 917, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ext sculptures and his next inventions. Similarly to da Vinci, Antonio Stradivari – an It...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, of course, sort of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 87.0 33.0505617978 263% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3330.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 708.0 442.535393258 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70338983051 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15832040409 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58865130518 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 347.0 215.323595506 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49011299435 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1015.2 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4625329015 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.909090909 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30303030303 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094396410002 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297799219247 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357399726987 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742711671798 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259654841511 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.