A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum before college
High school education is designed to prepare children for life which includes career and social life. The prompt is suggesting that a nation should require all of its students to study same syllebus until they enter college. I strongly disagree with the idea. A nation should give its students a chance to choose what they want to study before at high school. I think in this way because of three reasons.
The first reason is that, high school curriculam contains a pretty diverse syllebus. Students learn calculus, organic chemistry, vectors, basics of modern finance theories, foreign languages etc. If they are required to study all of these, it wouldn't be possible to finish everything in twelve years period. And if some subjects are eliminated, then students going to that particular subject in college would suffer. Suppose, a student majoring in finance had not learned finance, but this student knows organic chemistry and Spanish, which is not required in the study of fincance, he or she will be severly unprepared for college, which will result the college education either hard or lengthy and costly. If a nation can manage students to learn everything they need to get prepared for college, only then they can decide to take the suggestion of the prompt. But as we can clearly see, it's highly unpractical.
Secondly, students would get tired studying details of the subjects they are not interested in. It would greatly affect their learning ability. If a student is required to learn hard theories of Economics, but he is devoted to science, it may make him exauhsted. An small idea of every subject would be needed to sustain in the work life, which is taught in the junior high school, but at least in the senior high, they are ought to choose what they want to study in the future or what they like. Modern society doesn't need a lot of polymaths, it needs happy students prepared for the future.
Last reason I disagree with that is, it would need more time and money to ensure students to learn all the pre requisite subject for college. This may greatly affect the economy of developing countries as it would reqire more budget for education sectors and students would join workforce at an elder age than today. So it would not be practical to make such decision.
Some people may still argue with the idea that students sometimes may want to change the subject later. But the problem with that is, for some students, we cannot make a burden to all students. Current education system is allowing students to change their concentration after high school.
So, with all the discussion, we can clearly see that national curriculam is needed to devided at high school, before college. So, all students of a nation should not require studying same curriculam till college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... are required to study all of these, it wouldnt be possible to finish everything in twe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubject in college would suffer. Suppose, a student majoring in finance had not le...
^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
... to science, it may make him exauhsted. An small idea of every subject would be ne...
^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...uture or what they like. Modern society doesnt need a lot of polymaths, it needs happy...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, at least, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90315789474 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45499682653 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477894736842 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.2202810381 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.16 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312756827859 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963344334233 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126936466339 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189144963011 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124219136833 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.