a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
In my opinion, there are at least two major purposes behind the national education. One is to establish the fondation of konwledge for students to pursue advaned education. Another is to culitivate students' ability of critical thinking. Based on this assumpation, I would generally disagree with the statement since an unified curriculum can only achieve certain degree of the first purpose while leave the second purpose underdeveloped.
Firstly, it is obvious that a consistent knowlege foundation can be easily built if same national curriculum is applied for every students. However, students are diverse which means they have differernt aspects that should be taught to achieve their own potential. For example, the scope of useful capibilities are different for students in standard high school versus students in vocational school. While the first requires more knowledge-based curriculum, the latter needs practical skills to get them ready for the future job. In this case, the same or standard national curriculum will dismiss to serve the variety of students' needs and create deficiency for their learning.
Secondly, when the national curriculum is the same for all, then the problem is that who or which organization is appropriate to define and design the final curriculum that should be applied. It is common that different institutions or individuals will have various opinions or interpreations about the content that should be put into the national curriculum. Therefore, in order to produce an uniformed contents, only few organizations will be selected to participate in the curriculum editing, which will be problematic since it may only represent a few group's ideologies, not a comprehensive perspectives that are better to be taught. For instance, how the trafficing of black people is being discussed in the curriculum? Conservative group and liberal group might have totally different point of views. These different views will be missing if only one curriculum is adopted.
Third, only by providing different point of views can train students' critical thinking ability, which is the second purpose of the education, and this capability should be built as early as possible, so that students can truly apply them in daily info consumption. Again, if two sides of explanations of the black people traffiking are being both presented, then the students can first understand threr are different point of views. Second, they can discuss or even debate why there are two views existing and which one mighe be more relevant and precise to explain the history. This kind of practice is impossible to happen if there is only one national curriculum.
In conclusion, considering the diverse needs of different students, and the unbiased representation of the curriculums, as well as the early cultivation of students' critical thinking, i would suggest to apply different national curriculums than one to better achieve the purposes of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rally disagree with the statement since an unified curriculum can only achieve cer...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...riculum. Therefore, in order to produce an uniformed contents, only few organizati...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'content'?
Suggestion: content
...efore, in order to produce an uniformed contents, only few organizations will be selecte...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'perspective'?
Suggestion: perspective
... groups ideologies, not a comprehensive perspectives that are better to be taught. For insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tivation of students critical thinking, i would suggest to apply different nation...
^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest applying'.
Suggestion: suggest applying
... of students critical thinking, i would suggest to apply different national curriculums than one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41379310345 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98875406517 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2591257749 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233434704032 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082039802173 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608923222155 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136886065745 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485130204321 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.