A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
Every nation has the responsibility of education; developing its youth to respect the nation' s values and ethics. Thus it is important that the country chooses carefully how it develops the enlightenment of its citizens. The prompt encourages therefore that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. While I recognise that this position may have some advantages, I disagree that this should be implemented as a national policy for reasons I' ll explain below:
Firstly, I' d explain why one may lean towards this position. A nation may want to espouse equal development across its regions. Hence, the nation may be motivated to create a national curriculum that will ensure that same values and ideas are imparted all over the country. For example, it may be unfair to teach white supremacy in one aspect of the country while the other part of the country teaches equality and non-discrimination. If this approach is not taken, unequal development may occur. Whereby one region of the country is well-developed in one subject, say history, while the other lacks this knowledge.
Despite the point given above, I will champion the disagreement of the recommendation given above because a country cannot be uniform in every way. Take for example, a country as large and diverse as the United States of America. The states in the country are almost nations on their own, and skills and knowledge are not equally distributed. If a national curriculum is promulgated, and such constitution makes French language a compulsory aspect of high school education, some states will be able to find enough teachers, while others will be short of hands. French teachers may also not be willing to move the states where they are needed. As such, the unequal distribution of skills across a heterogenous country will pose a difficulty to the implementation of such a national curriculum. Thus, states should be allowed to create their curriculum that emphasises their own strengths and will give them comparative advantage.
Apart from the uneven distribution of resources that may be present across a nation, same may also happen within schools or states. Students have variety of interests, attitudes and talents. It is said that if you judge the ability of a fish on how well it can climb trees, it will live its life believing it is foolsih. If a national curriculum is imposed, then students be coerced into learning things that aren't useful to them until they enter college. And this recommendation would even be more disastrous to those students who decide not to pursue college education, especially when theyare unable t to acquire the skills needed for their specific career needs. Thus, nations have no business formulating policies that will force students to adhere to a curriculum that doesn't suit their career aspirations.
To conclude, while one may be inclined to think that a national curriculum will breed uniformity, there's no guarantee that uniformity may even be advantageous in the first place. Diversity is the spice of life. It is with these points that I disagree with the recommendation that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... respect the nations values and ethics. Thus it is important that the country choose...
^^^^
Line 1, column 505, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...mented as a national policy for reasons Ill explain below: Firstly, Id explain w...
^^^
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...ed as a national policy for reasons Ill explain below: Firstly, Id explain why one m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
... reasons Ill explain below: Firstly, Id explain why one may lean towards this p...
^^
Line 5, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...states should be allowed to create their curriculum that emphasises their own str...
^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ts be coerced into learning things that arent useful to them until they enter college...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 776, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...students to adhere to a curriculum that doesnt suit their career aspirations. To co...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ional curriculum will breed uniformity, theres no guarantee that uniformity may even b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2748.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12686567164 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87972688119 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481343283582 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 880.2 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4770626173 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.92 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.44 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31269530234 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963678736732 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11440856651 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220289777394 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118060948428 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.