A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Whether a nation should require all students to study same curriculum could be weighed in many aspects. However, the argument is based on generalization. The statement simply assume that all students have same ability to study same materials. Therefore, even though having same curriculum suggest equality, there is no guarantee that every student will benefit from it.
It is so argued that every citizens have the right to let their children study same curriculum, because students can have same level of study tools, and the entrance test for college will be more equitable. The real picture of this argument, however, is that every student have his own study pattern. The one with low level may not able to catch the pace of other students. For example. how can a student do not know the basic theory of plus and minus to study in high school. The same could be said to students good at studying and testing.
The supporters of youngsters should take same curriculum may still argued that this policy can increase the talents and people the country's company need, because every student is study same material. However, there are lots of subjects and departments in college. If all students focus on the four main subject the entrance test require, there may be lack of students major in art or sport, because they didn't study it before high-school. For example, if the famous F1 driver Lewis Hamilton, didn't practice his driving skill and take the courses or races for racing car, we may not see this five times world champion on the podium. Therefore, enrolling this policy is not good for the state.
Lastly, this policy may fail to enroll in some rural area. Because the recourses in different area may have lots of gaps. For example, due to lack of computer or TV in some of area in Taiwan, courses base on computer cannot be teach in that area. Besides, some urban recourse-rich area may have to force to not tech some important course, due to this policy.
In summary, this claim is not as persuasive as it stands. Although, having same national curriculum in every state could indeed benefits students, there are still lots of them will encounter disadvantage such as couldn’t catch up the pace, couldn’t having course other than the course teaching at school, or don’t have enough recourses to enroll the policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether a nation should require all students to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...he pace of other students. For example. how can a student do not know the basic the...
^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nts major in art or sport, because they didnt study it before high-school. For exampl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...if the famous F1 driver Lewis Hamilton, didnt practice his driving skill and take the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... may fail to enroll in some rural area. Because the recourses in different area may hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'couldn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...as couldn’t catch up the pace, couldn’t having course other than the course teaching a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89195979899 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44314791675 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507537688442 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.0368380943 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.35 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273713040894 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806160683591 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109703641653 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163899240252 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135874350479 0.0667264976115 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.