A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Today's students are tomorrow's leaders. So having them study the right curriculam at early stages of their life is absolutely a topic which requires deep thought. The prompt suggests that there should be a common syllabus for the students of an entire country until they pass out high school. I mostly agree with the author's point of view and would argue that maintaining a same syllabus for everybody would be beneficial to the nation.
Setting up a proper curriculum that would enhance the way a student thinks and learns in the initial stages of his life is an arduous task. Many vital points have to be taken into consideration while doing so. However, coming up with such an effective syllabus would prove beneficial to the nation in a long run. Coming to the point of having a common curriculum, I personally feel this would be fruitful as maintaining uniformity would enhance equality among people. There will be no question of saying that a particular state's syllabus is diffciult when compared to the syllabus of an other state. Evaluation of students based on merit will become fair.
To support the previous point, an example of Andhra Pradesh State Board and Bihar State Board can be taken. It is a common belief that the board results of Andhra Pradesh can reach a peak as high as 98% in SSC whereas a topper who is from Bihar hardly scores a 78%. While these two students have an equal caliber, it is the difference in their curriculam that is giving an extra advantage in terms of marks to one student and revoking this facility from the other.
Secondly, let us consider an example of a father who is employed in a particular job which demands him to move different places in the country and stay there for a period of time. In other words, if a father's job involves frequent transfers around the country, their children are bound to move along with them. For such students, it would be very easy to catchup on the syllabus if the same curiculum is maintained across the whole country. The father's work would not hamper his child's education.
When the recommendation in the prompt is evaluated properly, we can come across a disadvantage too. Having a same curriculum would have an indirect effect on the study of local languages. It is a known fact that all the local languages present in the country cannot be taught to each individual. It is the different state boards that teach their students their local language. To maintain a common syllabus means to select and include only few of these languges which would be unfair. The proper solution to this would be to exclude the languages part when designing the common curriculum. The choice of language can be left to each individual. This would serve the purpose of the author more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...fciult when compared to the syllabus of an other state. Evaluation of students based on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ces in the country and stay there for a period of time. In other words, if a fathers job invol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77130977131 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55378475113 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505197505198 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2522049086 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.24 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128908703955 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362469085657 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400182673327 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782876163353 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06609008774 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.