A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The prompt says that nation should urge all its students to study the same curriculum until they join their colleges. However, some people see that is a good approach for studying, but I totally disagree, for many reasons.
First, not all the national curriculum subjects fit all the students, it is not necessarily what fits an individual, fits the all. The generaization apporach is not the best goal to be adopted. In particularly, in the studying, as every one has his own skills and his predilictions. For example, if the national curriculum has specific subjects such as History, for sure not all students have the same inclination to study History. If someone's dream to major in engineering, so, what is the incentive to study History? Of cource, he will not perform as much as the subject needs, rather he will focus more on studying all the subjects that related to engineering for example, Mathematices. Thus, it's not a best way to put such a rigid system.
Further, upon the previous example, the rigid studying systems restricts the teachers' creativity, as all the teachers follow the standard and no more room to let them invent . For example, if the teacher should follow criteria in studying and it's not allowed to add something new as activities or workshops, undoubtedly, the teacher will not put more effort to choose the best approach to teach the students. As a corrollary, this way of teaching will negatively affect the students' performsnce as mentioned before because this fixid system doesn't fit the all. Therefore, to achieve the best effective way in studying, give some space to the teachers to move and give them the chance to create different ways out the national curriculum.
On the other hand, there are some will advocate the national curriculum. Of course , they are not totally wrong. If we will have the chance to take a part of this fixid system, I will go with taking the languages to be taught to all the students. As the languges are extremely important, all students should take them into account. All the fields will not conflict with languages. In the contrast, they will benefit them. For example, if some one wants to be a doctor or teacher, language is very important tool in cummunication with the patients or with the students. so, we can fix the some of the national curriculum and make the rest is adaptive to the students needs.
In conclusion, national curriculum is not a bad approach, but it needs some amendments to fit all the students skills and to give a chance to all the studenst as well as teachers to release their aptitudes and theri skills to be illuminated. Therefore, to achieve the best approach in studying, it should be adaptive and flixible to be fit to all the students different skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 696, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...eering for example, Mathematices. Thus, its not a best way to put such a rigid syst...
^^^
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...or example, Mathematices. Thus, its not a best way to put such a rigid system. F...
^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...he rigid studying systems restricts the teachers creativity, as all the teachers follow ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dard and no more room to let them invent . For example, if the teacher should foll...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'adding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: adding
...riteria in studying and its not allowed to add something new as activities or workshop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tioned before because this fixid system doesnt fit the all. Therefore, to achieve the ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ocate the national curriculum. Of course , they are not totally wrong. If we will ...
^^
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...they will benefit them. For example, if some one wants to be a doctor or teacher, langua...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 569, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...with the patients or with the students. so, we can fix the some of the national cu...
^^
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...r with the students. so, we can fix the some of the national curriculum and make the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r with the students. so, we can fix the some of the national curriculum and make the rest i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, of course, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82489451477 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76440814085 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445147679325 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6362069486 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4347826087 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6086956522 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203031086931 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677274279643 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061493037889 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138329730061 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497080767913 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.