A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
A curriculum of schools is always a moot question because this is the framework on which future generations of any country depends. I reckon that the curruiculum should be universal in any nation as this provides a lot of benefits for all the stakeholders but at the same time, there should be some flexibility to accomodate any diverse requirements.
To elaborate, the foremost thing is that the unified syllabus will not create unnecessary confusions. With so many varied curriculums, it is difficult for all who are involved with schools. For instance, there is always a doubt in the minds of parents that in which school they put their children to fulfill their aspirations. Sometimes, a school with particular framework is not located nearby and parents have to either migrate to that very place where that school is located or they have to commute their child on the daily basis and bearing extra financial burden. Similarly, for the governments, it is quite difficult to bring all the different syllabus at par and they have to put extra efforts to qualify any extra advantage to any particular framework. These things will not happen if we have one single structure for all the schools.
Moving further, a single framework can work against the conundrum of inequality. It will provide a great booster to Economically weaker section in the sense that with this they can put their children into the same study plan in which their opulent counterparts do. For instance, in some countries, there are education boards which have their unique curriculum and their cost is exorbitant, thus, engendering schools which are out of the reach from an ordinary families. With this, rich families can afford that quality education and can able to create separate pool of students in further studies as well which further results in segregation at the society level. Besides, when comes to teachers, they will feel equal and will have more opportunity to earn when all schools have same framework.
However, a unified must not mean that there is no room for adjustments. Because a nation comprises of lot many diverse communities, the school framework must include demands from variety of sections. For instance, if any community has its own language but uncommon in the other parts of that nation, then, there should be a space in the study plan to include their language for the students belonged to their people.
Therefore, for any country, to provide a clear and transparent framework, to provide an equal opportunity to all of the people and to accommodate the unique requirements, a single framework will serve better than diverse frameworks. While framing it, people from all groups must be on the table.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
...h are out of the reach from an ordinary families. With this, rich families can afford th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... room for adjustments. Because a nation comprises of lot many diverse communities, the schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ork, to provide an equal opportunity to all of the people and to accommodate the unique re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75438684893 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482222222222 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1644496194 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196464706972 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646751324488 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387432836662 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11414176362 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331021276529 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.