The above statement concerns the education curriculum implementation at the school level. My views on this particular statement submerged somewhere in between the agreeing and disagreeing line. The national curriculum of any country is defined and designed covering the interest of the wider number of children. However, no any curriculum can utmost cover the inteligent and skills of the whole student population. The same curriculum for all the students is similair to the same dishes served in the feast.
Every children have their own interest and own sort of skills. Their basic skills are almost explored in the school level. Such expliction is proportion to the course content, their curriculum and the way they are nuturted in the school. Therefore, the curriculum is sturctued by the expertise to cover the huge range of variation of skills. Nevertheless, the compulsory course book and limited elective subject might causes children to bend down their skills and focus on what they really do not want.
Most of the south asian country have included the language like French, Spanish, and chinese in thier curriculum. School children who can explore thier field of interest in those time are compelled to focus on somewhere else. One positive aspect of these curriculum is they are making student multilingual which can be used in the future for global pupose. The curriculum similarization for all comes with both the pros and cons.
Some of the anthropologist thought these as the basic plot for the thinking power since during schools most of the childrens do not have developed the sense of choosing the better carrier path. Most of them are unaware about thier strength and capabilites. So it is advisable to have the similar course structure and curriculum until college. Despite this is the fact, the interest of the minority cannot be ignored since some are really facing a tough time competeting with the curriculum of their disinterest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... the wider number of children. However, no any curriculum can utmost cover the int...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...the same dishes served in the feast. Every children have their own interest and ow...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (thier) must be used with a third-person verb: 'fields'.
Suggestion: fields
.... School children who can explore thier field of interest in those time are compelled...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this curriculum' or 'these curricula', 'these curriculums'?
Suggestion: this curriculum; these curricula; these curriculums
... somewhere else. One positive aspect of these curriculum is they are making student multilingual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...l comes with both the pros and cons. Some of the anthropologist thought these as the bas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17924528302 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73954965511 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9942124978 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94444444444 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173473419275 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055131149542 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591774680382 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10405041117 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612821367177 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.