A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement states that the having an uniform curriculum should be mandatory for the nation, as due to some positive connotations. I diagree to the statement to some extent. I think having the same curriculum for an entire nation would have several limitations, though having a similar layout could be beneficial. For example, for kids studying in two different states would have similar curriculum in many subjects but their would be certain disparities regarding subjects involving history and culture of the state. Since a nation could be quite diverse and states would have their own diversity, a single curriculum could not contain information or knowledge regarding every state. It would have uneven patterns for history regarding each state and even if we assume it to be all-inclusive, students from other states might not appreciate it.
A single curriculum would not be able to take care of students who belong to other side of the spectrum. For example, student who have mental issues would not be able to catch up with the curriculum and hence their education would severely suffer. On the other hand, students who are gifted, might find the curriculum to be trivial and find that it is holding them back.
However, one could argue that having the same curriculum ensures that students share the same foundational knowledge which they could later utilize when entering college. This would also eliminate redundancies and the college curriculum for programmes would be concise. For example, if some students had 3-D geomertry in their curriculum while some did not, the college would have to include 3-D geometry course for student in "STEM" field. It would also reduce the discrepancies in student's knowledge.
However, I would argue that even though there are different curriculums for different schools, they could share a certain layout amongst different subjects. For example, even though, a school A has different curriculum than school B, they would similar layout in terms of subjects let's say Science, Mathematics and English. Having a different curriculum where one could try to encompass same ideas but with different contexts or style. For example, the mentally challenged students and mentally gifted students would both study Algebra, but the level of detail and problem difficulty would be different.
One can understand the importance of having different curriculums, at the same time one has to understand that the curriculums should also share a certain layout amongst them so that the students when they reach college, the redundancies could be removed and they could build upon some uniform knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
The statement states that the having an uniform curriculum should be mandatory ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, while, as to, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31116389549 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75594227276 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44893111639 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6035625913 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.222222222 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181893290203 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741248469393 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322323702112 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112280164225 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342569046013 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.