A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they
enter college.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation above and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your
position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or
would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
Almost every nation contemplates on the development of their existing education system to cope up with the modern world. In this regard, researchers in this background have often presented their suggestion by which it can be modified. The issue here claims such an arguable statement that a nation should require all of its students study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Despite, a profuse number of dissents may refuse this idea, a clear inspection of this statement and the consensus of many researches support this idea more likely.
First of all, if the students are exposed to explore all the arenas of subjects, they will be able to find their exact interest, thereby establishing their own goal in the future. To clarify this, lets say, you are asking a ingenuous student what he wants to be in future. In reply, he will definitely say something that he used to see in his dreams. He wants to be something from the castles he built in the air while dreaming, however, this ridiculous life goals may further proved to be difficult to accomplish. Instead, if we let them study all the basic courses, he will garner rudimentary ideas about all of them, which subsequently will lead him to discover his talents thereby resulting finding his actual ambition.
Besides, the idea of unifying all the subjects until college can be a great scale of the competition since today's world is highly competitive. While many students are not able to determine their goal, on the basis of the performances on the tests, they can be suggested to focus more on the courses of their expertise, thus helping them to choose their individual target. For example, in a class of 60, 20 students top in maths courses, 20 in literature, and 20 in other courses. Nevertheless, if the schools never implemented this system ever, students could never be aware of their talent in the respective fields.
On the contrary, the opposite of the proposal can not be fully rejected. Sometimes, kids show extraordinary inherent likings towards a subject. If they are compelled to the schools hidebound syllabus, they will never get the opportunity to nourish their intrinsic talents. To illustrate the fact, if Einstein - one of the best quintessential prodigy in the field of physics - were to study arts and history, the world would never experience the feats. of such a great scientist.
Yet, students can not be exposed to such a tradition where they have to choose the subjects what are after their mind. Such a decision will in the long run deprive them from the basic knowledges one must have. Moreover, caring each and every individual with different choices of curriculum will be very costly. Therefore, the national curriculum should require all the pupil to study the same national curriculum but they should not be compelled to do so, otherwise the whole curriculum will feel onerous upon him, and cause the whole eduction system seem vapid to him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... clarify this, lets say, you are asking a ingenuous student what he wants to be i...
^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...a ingenuous student what he wants to be in future. In reply, he will definitely say somet...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...world would never experience the feats. of such a great scientist. Yet, stude...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98390342052 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69822991178 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531187122736 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5147830432 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.590909091 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5909090909 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174341495365 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495246693671 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828074062658 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980833581453 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711661261224 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.