A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

The issue of whether a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, has engendered controversy and can be divided into two schools of thought. On the one hand, staunch defenders support that students should be adapted at the same knowledge before entering college. On the other hand, opponents contend that students should have the right to specific and different courses. Were I, in such an ambiguous position whether to agree or disagree, I would support the former idea, even though the latter one may present certain advantages.

First and foremost, students of a nation should be educated at the same principles and mores, rendering them equal and discerning them from other students of different nations. Indeed, schools should provide a general view of the history of the pertinent nation, educating childern at a manner that will help them define themselves and realize their role and scope. Apart from that, students should always be adapted to certain scientific principles and create a complete image of the natural environment that surrounds everyone on earth. To be precise, during their years at school, Greek students should be educated at history and deeply understand the different figures that make them distinguish from other nations. In addition, they should also be introduced to specific scientific fields, such as mathematics, physics and geography. Therefore, they are likely to learn the fundamemtal things that will shape their future knowledge of the universe.

Moreover, when students of a nation study the same national curriculum until they enter college, they tend to bolster their perspectives and broaden their horizons. Admittedly, students will have a strong fundamental base of the different scientific theories and practices pronounced at school. Consequently, they are likely to sharpen their acumen, be optimistic, open-minded and self-confident. They will have strong values and knowledge as they will have learned the general idea of most aspects of life. For example, a nation that provides a national curriculum for all of its students, in future, will have professionals that even with theoritical background, will possess the basics of mathematics and calculations. Therefore, they will be prolific in any case of life that requires numerical facts.

According to other school of thought, students should be left to choose between different options regarding their national curriculum, while at school. Although it might present some benefits, for instance freedom of will and chance to be directed to specific courses, its disadvantages outweigh its advantages. Most important, colleges promote many opportunities for young people to select what kind of expertise they want to pursue and what kind of professionals they want to be. Therefore, it is too early before college to apply such directions.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly believe that the education policies of each nation should be on the basis of same national curriculum for all students before college. It constitutes the only and most prolific way for individuals, to gain varying knowledge and be articulate professionals. In reference to that, they are likeli to make our societies prosper and make all the deleterious effects disappear.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 592, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nal curriculum for all of its students, in future, will have professionals that even with...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in any case, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2821.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47766990291 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91026700962 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491262135922 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8696900113 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.652173913 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4347826087 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438994823752 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132815481582 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1606205664 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277968634766 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115752791012 0.0667264976115 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.