The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
The issue of whether best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead, has engendered controversy and can be divided into two schools of thought. On the one hand, staunch supporters suggest that people who directly receive the results of their leaders, are those that can justify accurately any policy. On the other hand, opponents contend that sometimes people may present a partial view for their leaders, in order to mitigate any negative consequences. Were I, in such an ambiguous position whether to agree or disagree, I would support the former argument idea, even though, the latter one may present some positive attributes.
First and foremost, individuals whose lives are directly affected by any policies of their leaders, are the most appropriate ones to express their ideas about these measures. Indeed, people who are governed are able to see changes in their lives on daily basis. These changes could be either positive or even sometimes negative. Thus, the leader who accepts feedback from the people whom he or she leads, could easily understand and bolster his role in order to promote prosperity and justicy into the whole society. For example, President Assad, the leader of Syria for the last years, although he is considered from his foreign allies as a resourceful and capable leader, he has been accused by his people of using chemical weapons and prohibiting any sort of strikes against the government. Therefore, it has been proved lately that Assad is one of the main contributors of the Syrian war, a result that came after fim ignoring the feedback from his people.
Moreover, leaders who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead, are likely to better understand their role and help the pertinent society thrive. In reference to that, they will have a clear and dinstict idea of all the deleterious circumstances existed, making the most to make them disappear. For instance, Angela Merkel would achieve great results for her country, both in economic and social aspects, if she is about to hear all the problems that Germans are facing due to illegal drugs entering the country. Consequently, she would have high chances to solve such an issue, ignoring all those superflous options considering that Germany is far from crime and drug abuse.
According to the other school of thought, sometimes people may be possessed by fault impressions about their leaders, therefore any attempt to give them feedback is scant and lacks substantiation. Nonetheless, partisans constitute a small portion of the societies in modern world and they are usually found in dictatorial regimes. In these regimes, all leaders are far away from being characterised prolific.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly believe that people who have a direct correlation with the policies implemented by their leaders, are the most capable ones to give them feedback. Undoubtedly, leaders around the globe, create both advantages and disadvantages by their actions. Thus, impartial and unbiased feedback is the best option for our societies to prosper and thrive in such a difficult world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2636.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23015873016 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71211507005 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3069353199 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.8 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385143535509 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115156542718 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147424629168 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209640288627 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690223086296 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.