A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement suggests that all students in a country should be made to study the same curriculum till they enter college, irrespective of the career choices these students would make in the future. This means that the only difference in education for a student wanting to major in say, arts, and a student wishing to pursue a career in engineering would be the education they would receive in the short four years of college. According to me, this recommendation would be detrimental to the overall quality of education of the students and thus, should not be implemented.
Nowadays, a spectrum of careers are open to the students; careers which require extremely different skills. For example, a journalist needs to be well-versed in language, needs presence of mind and an excellent general knowledge. Whereas, a physicist needs to be extremely good at mathematics, patient and diligent. While it cannot be said that a quality required for being a good journalist, presence of mind, would be harmful if present in a physicist, it surely is not used in the kind of work a physicist does. Thus, if a student wants to be a physicist, it would be more helpful for him/her to take up courses in mathematics, physics etc. rather than courses like public speaking, painting etc.
This customization of courses should be possible right from high-school; a student must be allowed to gain in-depth knowledge about the topics he/she would require later in their lives as a professional. Forbidding a student from doing so could adversely affect the depth of the student's knowledge, which will circumscribe his capacities in his/her career of choice. A student who wants to be an artist should not only have access to the basic foundation courses required, such as drawing, painting etc. but also have a choice in gaining further knowledge by learning about, say, renaissance paintings. This will ensure that the student's knowledge about his/her specialization will be more in-depth and gained throughout a period of time. Adopting the recommendation will engender a shallow understanding as all the specialized knowledge the students will gain would be in a comparitively short duration of four years in college. Thus, their performance as a professional would suffer due to their superficial knowledge.
On the other hand, some portion should be same for school students. Every student must have a basic idea about every possible career choice, because exposure to such diverse topics could engender interest in some students. For example, a student who had predilection for arts could get fascinated by mathematics or geography after learning about it in school. Students must be given a chance to choose what they would like to study in their life. Basic knowledge of many fundamental ideas should be given to students. For example, every student must know something about mathematics, as they will need it in future for taxes.
Thus, all students must have some common topics that they learn, however, having the
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ive in the short four years of college. According to me, this recommendation would be detriment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e more in depth and gained throughout a period of time. Adopting the recommendation will engen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ics that they learn, however, having the
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'kind of', 'of course', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235815602837 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.154255319149 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0656028368794 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0372340425532 0.0497285424764 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0425531914894 0.0444667217837 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132978723404 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0443262411348 0.0406280797675 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90632138622 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031914893617 0.030933414821 103% => OK
Particles: 0.00177304964539 0.0016655270985 106% => OK
Determiners: 0.108156028369 0.0997080785238 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0549645390071 0.0249443105267 220% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00886524822695 0.0148568991511 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3028.0 2732.02544248 111% => OK
No of words: 500.0 452.878318584 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.056 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90632138622 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.3436708045 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7391304348 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9852686909 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.652173913 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7391304348 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.608695652174 0.674092028746 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.5391304348 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.76515151515 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277187398755 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124307217398 0.123202303941 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0934484308162 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.516337864852 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185968544729 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10722133263 0.161403998019 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093298312729 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.30730984822 0.385218514788 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0875987572196 0.0692045440612 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187204907338 0.275328986314 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779746736746 0.0653680567796 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.