Is it possible to properly educate every student with a single curriculum? The statement claims that a country should make a national curriculum and require every students to follow that curriculum. Although it might seem as a convenient way to educate students, it could be problematic because it fail to take account of students' individual difference which might lead to lost of motivation and inefficiency.
First of all, the matter of who will be deciding what subjects should be included in the curriculum and what should not, is questionable. If the government will enforcing every school to teach according to a single curriculum, the contents of it should be with high quality and should not be biased. However, there is no guarantee that the national curriculum satisfies that standards, and even if it does now, there is a possibility of it being criticized by later generations. Therefore, as there is no such thing as a single perfect curriculum, it will be risky to require every students to follow uniform curriculum.
Secondly, having a single curriculum nationally will deter students’ motivation and ability to study because it could hardly satisfy the heterogeneous demand of students. Usually there is a variety of choices available for students. Students who are interested in playing musical instruments can choose to enroll in a music school and who have a deep interest in natural science can choose science-specialized school. However, if every single schools have the same curriculum, the individual differences between students will be ignored and they will all have to study the exact same thing. Studying the same things that they do not want, or even need, students’ motivation to study will decline.
In addition, unified curriculum nationwide will lead to a more severe competition between students. It is true the single curriculum will make it easier for colleges to compare the academic ability between students nationwide, and decide whether they can enter the university or not. Nevertheless, this will form a synchronized standard of a ‘good student‘, and make students to compete even more to be that good student.
In conclusion, making every students to study will a unified curriculum nationally is a risky decision as it could undermine the motivation of students and intensify the competition and because the matter of ‘what’ curriculum should be required remains questionable.
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your r73
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis62
- Describe our reasons for pursuing graduate study and your academic and professional interests and goals16
- Describe your reasons for pursuing graduate study and your academic and professional interests and goals80
- 3.The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'fails'?
...nts, it could be problematic because it fail to take account of students individual ...
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enforce'
...is questionable. If the government will enforcing every school to teach according to a si...
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...is will form a synchronized standard of a 'good student', and make stud...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37046632124 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18698025358 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458549222798 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5757558718 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318370391871 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124081819941 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850341716477 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201383164305 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414979102389 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.