Education system of a country can determine how well the nation develops. In ancient China, there is a saying that " it takes ten years to know how to grow a tree, but it takes a hundred years to know how to educate people well". How to effectively teach students is certainly a major issue for every contries. One of the major issue is whether a nation should have all their students study the same curriculum until they enter college. Although some may believe that a diversity in curriculums may have benefits, I believe that maintaining the same national curriculum for all students is a far better option.
One of the advantages of having a single curriculum for all students to work on is that it lets students to strive for more generality. In countries that have several curriculums before college, students start to learn specific knowledge before they have acquired enough general knowledge. Specification at a younger age may help them master certain aspects of the chosen field faster, but lacking the general sense of knowledge would keep these students from seeing challenges from a more comprehensive view. On the other hand, in countries that enforce a single curriculum for students to study before college, students exhibits the ability to see the big picture, and may perform better once they master the field in college.
Another advantage for implementing the same national curriculum for yougsters is it makes teachers easier to provide high quality courses. Teachers in high school would know exactly what ability students needs to have. Therefore, they can focus on developing an engaging learning environment. If, however, a nation provides several curriculums, a teacher may be confused about what exactly should he or she expect from the students. The teacher would waste time on determining whether certain knowledge should be taught or not instead of focusing on how to teach well. The same applies to college education. Professors could provide a much better course if all his or her students have a similar learning background.
Having several curriculums does have its pros. For instance, it provides a higher diversity among students. It also enable students to start specializing in a certain field at a younger age. However, the fact that several curriculums fail to provide sufficient amount of general knowledge and keep educators from efficiently provide a better learning experience outweighs the advantages having multiple curriculum provides. Therefore, I believe that a nation should enforce a single curriculum on all students until they enter college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...em master certain aspects of the chosen field faster, but lacking the general sense o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'expects'.
Suggestion: expects
...sed about what exactly should he or she expect from the students. The teacher would wa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
...igher diversity among students. It also enable students to start specializing in a cer...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...m efficiently provide a better learning experience outweighs the advantages having multipl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24105011933 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7953658657 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472553699284 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2125556722 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235148192624 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854928202382 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872332931772 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161776938138 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333286180708 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.