A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The educated persona of a nation is the best representatitve of that nations progress as an enlightened country. Although there are certain benefits to the same curriculum nationwide for all the students, its immense drawbacks outweigh its benefits and therefore I disagree with the view completely.
First of all, Having the exact same curriculum over the whole nation means that the nation is able to create the very best curriculum possible for its students considering its economic, socio-cultural and technological advancements. Having an ubiquitous system means that changes are easier and any change made to improve the whole system can be disseminated throughout the entire country within a short span of time. Therefore the nation is able to keep pace with the outside world by making frequent necessary changes to its curriculum. Also, any other kind of improvement is generally much more faster and smoother.
We cannot, however, ignore the fact that having a nationwide system puts a curb on the progress of a nation as a whole. It limits the potential of the students to improve their talents in a certain field and puts a restriction on the innovative and novel ideas that might otherwise be generated. For example a student might be extremely good as a cricket player or he may be highly talented as a literary figure or a musician. These talents need to be nurtured from the very childhood namely the elementary and intermediate schools for them to be truly successful in their very own fields. But at the same time they might be apathetic to the national caurriculum and do bad at the exams premeditated by the nation. Forcing them to continue their studies without their consent and at the same time restraining them so that they cant pursue their goals or their likings creates a general uninterest among these students and some of them might even drop out from the school. A nationwide curruculum, thus, in no way helps us to nurture and improve the unique potential of our individuals.
Last but not the least, we shouldn't think that employing a nationwide curriculum till the students are admitted to college and then taking it off is going to help the individual talent of the students immediately. Change takes time, and all the students that had all of their thinking done for them till now will now need to think outside the box to know what they actually want to do with their lives. But for the greater portion of their life, their actions and willings weren't considered and now that suddenly they are put in a situation where improvisation is necessary, most students will enevitably falter. Therefore, to create the system of nevel and innovative thinking in out students we need to prepare them from the very beginning, from school.
In conclusion, the national curriculum to control the education system of the entire country is a well-intended but flawed idea as its effects on the system and on the bearers is derogative. Moreover, its inabilities to make its students think for themselves as well as its general constraints on the innovation and improvement of the unique abilities of an individual makes it an unsound proposal that will need further modification to suit to all these needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... and technological advancements. Having an ubiquitous system means that changes ar...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...re country within a short span of time. Therefore the nation is able to keep pace with th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...r kind of improvement is generally much more faster and smoother. We cannot, however, ig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 828, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...same time restraining them so that they cant pursue their goals or their likings cre...
^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ividuals. Last but not the least, we shouldnt think that employing a nationwide curri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... their life, their actions and willings werent considered and now that suddenly they a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2699.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97970479705 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84645449803 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477859778598 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 853.2 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4701860828 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.052631579 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5263157895 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277213981251 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910544122468 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830661865015 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175251274628 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504959686371 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.