Some people advocate that a nation should demand all the students to study a unified curriculum before college while some oppose. A unified curriculum across the country might be beneficial in some aspects. However, in my view, it is not practical for a nation to require all of its students to study the same national curriculum before going to university.
To begin with, the avocation that all students in a country are required to study the same curriculum from elementary school to high school is beneficial in some ways. A unified curriculum designed by the national government can ensure all the students receive the same content of education before college, in which way educational equality can be guaranteed despite of regional discrepancies on economic development. It would also be much simpler for colleges to design standards to enroll students as well as curriculums in the college years since the unified curriculum can eliminate the necessity of auxiliary courses which might be imposed on students to ensure the uniformed education level before studying in college. In this way, a national curriculum can do substantial contributions to the society as well as students.
However, we cannot ignore the practical difficulty of implementation of such a policy which completely ignores the developmental differences among different regions inside a country. For many countries economic gaps exist between large cities and peripheral cities as well as urban and rural areas. If the curriculum is designed according to educational resources in big cities rich in facilities and experienced teachers, it might be too tough a task for rural schools to complete teaching goals. Conversely, if the making of the curriculum considered the actual development situation of most rural areas in the nation, the abundant resources in affluent areas could not get sufficiently utilized and parents in those regions might demonstrate such a waste of resource, which could have been used to promote the study of their children.
Furthermore, cultural preservation might conflict with a nationally unified curriculum. For countries with multiple races and cultures like China and America, it is rather difficult for a national curriculum to cover all the various cultures in limited courses. The most prevailing culture is commonly selected as the major culture of the nation, which would result in ignorance of some minor cultures. In this case, preservation of such culture could face unexceptional tough situation. Minor cultures could begin to devolve and finally diminish with fewer and fewer people knowing about. Precious cultural relics like folk songs and ancient languages might gradually become antiques in the passage of time. So for nations with multiple cultures, a national curriculum before college is not a good choice.
In sum, the requirement that all of students in a nation should study the same curriculum before college is not practical. Curriculum design should take regional economic development and ethnic culture into consideration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as well as, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44025157233 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93990008998 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482180293501 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 848.7 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2194495907 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270948954624 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987709948088 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797266057669 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177210660512 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547646937128 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.